Subject	Funny thing how PE rates the A/R, is is 20 for the 1420/1820
Posted by	Chip(GinnMotorsports) on November 02, 2002 at 1:57 PM
	This message has been viewed 62 times.
In Reply To	Re: HKS 2835 vs. PE 1420/1820 posted by Seb on November 01, 2002 at 11:47 PM
Message	hence their name 14(m^3 flow)20(A/R), or 18(m^3 flow)20(A/R). On paper the smaller kit should hit 575+ (I am conservative), with your boss man's manifolds, it would be interesting. It has a much more efficient compressor/turbine than the TDO5-16G, not to mention BB CHRA. It may put out more power than the 16G because of the greater effiency at higher boost levels. Spool is slightly faster than the 2530 according to Kuah's contacts in Asia.
Follow Ups	HKS 2835 vs. PE 1420/1820 - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 23:44:08 11/01/02 Re: HKS 2835 vs. PE 1420/1820 - Seb 23:47:21 11/01/02 That smaller kit put's out TD05 power? (n/m) - ZBlacktt 23:52:45 11/01/02 Re: That smaller kit put's out TD05 power? - Seb 23:54:34 11/01/02 I wonder too.. - degradated 06:12:21 11/02/02 If memory servers me right, lag is a little better than - Chris(NJ) 07:30:36 11/02/02 Not quite, the 1420 is within 5-10 cfm of the 16G, BUT - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 13:52:51 11/02/02 Funny thing how PE rates the A/R, is is 20 for the 1420/1820 - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 13:57:29 11/02/02 Sure there a $700ea between the both brands too.lol. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 23:51:43 11/01/02 And 100+ HP difference. (n/m) - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 14:05:05 11/02/02 i'm confused... exhaust outlet? - Bernie 07:37:34 11/02/02 Where the DP bolts on, at the turbine it is just over 2" - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 13:50:19 11/02/02 ah, ok, gotcha. i was looking at the 1820. :) (n/m) - Bernie 14:57:48 11/02/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.