Subject	Re: 2+2 vs 2+0 - Wheelbase, Handling, Pros/Cons...
Posted by	Bigmatthew86 on June 20, 2017 at 4:14 PM
	This message has been viewed 500 times.
In Reply To	2+2 vs 2+0 - Wheelbase, Handling, Pros/Cons... posted by mattgold on June 20, 2017 at 09:49 AM
Message	I don't know this for sure but back when teams raced the z32's I think most went with the 2+2 due to it being more stable. Personally I like the look of the 2 seater version but the 2+2 isn't a bad looking car. I had a 87 300zx as my first car & I thought the 2+2 in that version was butt ugly. I have a 94 2seater tt beater that has had a tt swap & it is plenty stable. I'm not racing so take that for what it's worth.
Follow Ups	2+2 vs 2+0 - Wheelbase, Handling, Pros/Cons... - mattgold 09:49:07 06/20/17 Re: 2+2 vs 2+0 - Wheelbase, Handling, Pros/Cons... - Bigmatthew86 16:14:10 06/20/17 Re: Re: 2+2 vs 2+0 - Wheelbase, Handling, Pros/Cons... - mattgold 00:23:38 06/21/17 Re: Re: Re: 2+2 vs 2+0 - Wheelbase, Handling, Pros/Cons... - Bigmatthew86 07:44:23 06/21/17 I have both (jdm tt versions) ..... - zx299 02:20:03 06/22/17 I own both a 2+0 and 2+2 TT - Doug71zt(CAN) 22:50:52 06/23/17
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.