Subject	Yeah there you go.
Posted by	kickerzx on November 21, 2016 at 9:43 AM
	This message has been viewed 406 times.
In Reply To	Re: Re: bypass and use walbro 485 posted by BarryGZX on November 21, 2016 at 03:35 AM
Message	My 20kpa in my demo log is 3 psi. We got about the same setup as far as i can see. Your engine would run richer than before if your closed loop lambdacorrection (i assume you use it) didnt correct for the increased pressure. At wot nothing would be different as you would have full voltage at the pump in any case. You can clearly see that the feed portion of the stock fuel system isnt up to the task. I have the 485 AND the 255 running at full speed at WOT and differential pressure STILL drops. Tuning is a big part of my life so i tune and log all the time and see what is happening. But "regular" people would probably never know something is off if the car doesnt drive much different. So wiring the pump directly doesnt seem like such a great advice for a stock car now i hope. Remember the OP from the other forum had stock FPR...
Follow Ups	FPCU: OEM vs Ashspec? - kurt81 06:36:50 11/19/16 bypass and use walbro 485 - dfenton2 11:39:44 11/19/16 Re: bypass and use walbro 485 - kickerzx 09:15:29 11/20/16 Re: Re: bypass and use walbro 485 - BarryGZX 03:35:16 11/21/16 Yeah there you go. - kickerzx 09:43:31 11/21/16 I don't like the bypass idea. - kurt81 05:44:10 11/22/16 Re: Yeah there you go. - BarryGZX 15:57:11 11/22/16 Aeromotive makes a fuel pump controller that will - not4resaleZ 13:11:18 11/20/16 My gripe with the Aeromotive unit is that it only - kickerzx 14:35:57 11/20/16 This. RPM alone is not a good way to control pump speed. (n/m) - MixManMash 10:59:35 11/21/16 Re: This. RPM alone is not a good way to control pump speed. - kurt81 05:42:10 11/22/16
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.