Subject	Because the 89 model year was a Z31 not a Z32.
Posted by	Fast300 on August 16, 2008 at 1:06 AM
	This message has been viewed 77 times.
In Reply To	Why not? I drive a 1989 Z32 TT. posted by Pilot.P (NZ) on August 16, 2008 at 12:23 AM
Message	My 93 TT was made in 11/92 but it is still a 93 model.
Follow Ups	Problems with the 350z track rotor upgrade - ttzcadet 20:13:19 08/15/08 No such thing as a 89 TT. 90 was first model year for Z32 - Fast300 21:50:04 08/15/08 Re: No such thing as a 89 TT. 90 was first model year for Z32 - ttzcadet 22:07:13 08/15/08 89/90 NA had thinner rotors. (n/m) - Dane (Houston) 22:59:31 08/15/08 And different size brake calipers to fit the thinner rotors. (n/m) - Fast300 01:03:00 08/16/08 Don't say '89'. Refer to the model year, not the build date. (n/m) - SactoTodd 18:40:09 08/16/08 Auto noob, Say build date not year model - Dane (Houston) 19:43:19 08/16/08 Why not? I drive a 1989 Z32 TT. - Pilot.P (NZ) 00:23:05 08/16/08 Because the 89 model year was a Z31 not a Z32. - Fast300 01:06:59 08/16/08 I am not sure why you would be having a problem. - robo (sebring1970) 09:12:06 08/16/08 Re: Problems with the 350z track rotor upgrade - WazTTed 09:23:25 08/16/08 Yes, many were made in 89, but they are 90 models - Fast300 21:18:32 08/16/08 Re: Yes, many were made in 89, but they are 90 models - plumwerks 21:49:37 08/16/08 Re: Problems with the 350z track rotor upgrade - ttzcadet 18:34:54 08/16/08 thanks for the follow-up. at least yur human-bean - robo (sebring1970) 07:18:53 08/17/08 You're welcome. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 08:14:22 08/17/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.