Subject	In an ideal world, you are correct -->
Posted by	therinL on September 06, 2003 at 4:43 PM
	This message has been viewed 39 times.
In Reply To	Size's are not comparable tho. posted by ZBlacktt on September 06, 2003 at 04:35 PM
Message	You are right; ideally, it is a no brainer. There are 2 reasons I brought it up: 1. It didnt seem to have been addressed, and people may have misuderstood the statement of his conclusion. 2. Turbos, like most things, are classical optimization problems. It is my professional emperical opinion that the 16G is a better choice for our cars than the 20G. It is also my professional emperical opinion that the 20G has some level of diminishing return when compared to a 16G, price/performance wise. =)
Follow Ups	Hey Wagz dyno post? - 2ltl2l8 13:07:03 09/06/03 Search...under his name..I am pretty sure he posted it... (n/m) - Pats300zx 14:11:22 09/06/03 Here you go.. - AshsZ of Z1Motorsports.com 14:20:48 09/06/03 Here you go----> - Kyle(Houston) 14:40:12 09/06/03 =) I found it after I posted that question. - AshsZ of Z1Motorsports.com 14:59:46 09/06/03 Actually that is more a product of the nitrous & not turbos - Kyle(Houston) 15:26:51 09/06/03 Ash is correct however in that: - therinL 15:33:23 09/06/03 Agreed but the High Tq spike is a product of the Nitrous.... (n/m) - Kyle(Houston) 15:52:02 09/06/03 I didn't see any of it as a 'correction' to my explanation - AshsZ of Z1Motorsports.com 16:29:27 09/06/03 Size's are not comparable tho. - ZBlacktt 16:35:15 09/06/03 In an ideal world, you are correct --> - therinL 16:43:13 09/06/03 Yes, all depends on your application (n/m) - ZBlacktt 18:09:54 09/06/03 that is a nice curve... - Boris 19:21:14 09/06/03 that aint wagz car... thats mine i stole it last night (n/m) - Solidpantz 00:23:42 09/07/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.