Subject	No, that weight is GROSS Vehicle weight and is correct.
Posted by	SeedyROM on June 17, 2003 at 2:49 AM
	This message has been viewed 33 times.
In Reply To	Re: Oh it's on a Z alright...1995 Nissan 300ZX. Weird though posted by turbo1 on June 17, 2003 at 02:43 AM
Message	That's how much the vehicle is allowed to weigh at it's max with two people, luggage, etc in it. Not the actual dry weight of the car. My 300Zs: www.zheaven.com - Have a question about either of my 300ZXs? Answers lie within. Admin: www.350ZForum.com - Your source for the lastest info on the new Nissan 350Z! Writer: www.SportZMagazine.com - Nothing but Z cars from cover to cover! Subscribe today! Moderator: www.TwinTurbo.net - Hands down, the best site for 90-96 Z car info and discussion!
Follow Ups	Is this an OEM Nissan Label? - NATAZ 02:07:08 06/17/03 Not for a Z sold in the United States. - SeedyROM 02:11:19 06/17/03 seconded - looks fishy (n/m) - Tikigod ZX 02:13:25 06/17/03 Re: Is this an OEM Nissan Label? - turbo1 02:15:03 06/17/03 Oh it's on a Z alright...1995 Nissan 300ZX. Weird though - SeedyROM 02:21:56 06/17/03 Man, that almost looks fabricated too - NATAZ 02:37:50 06/17/03 Re: Oh it's on a Z alright...1995 Nissan 300ZX. Weird though - turbo1 02:43:16 06/17/03 No, that weight is GROSS Vehicle weight and is correct. - SeedyROM 02:49:25 06/17/03 how mcuh did ur interior cost to redo on ur white 2+2? (n/m) - turbo1 02:48:05 06/17/03 Mine was mostly free since I was the test car long ago - SeedyROM 02:52:58 06/17/03 i found a guy around my area that will do my seats for me - turbo1 21:57:30 06/17/03 to me, that looks photoshopped.. (n/m) - CaptanZap 02:38:42 06/17/03 Here's the link to the ebay auction, if anyone is interested - NATAZ 02:44:14 06/17/03 4 of those photos look like it's been hit/repainted - SeedyROM 02:52:06 06/17/03 Yeah, my thoughts exactly - NATAZ 03:27:28 06/17/03 hood is sitting funny (n/m) - Initial Z 03:29:53 06/17/03 Yep...Somebody jacked the car up on the wrong place (n/m) - therinL 09:14:52 06/17/03 It could be a replacement VIN tag if the car was hit - Dave N 07:04:18 06/17/03 On a 95 those "cut outs" are still there and have no lables - YugoBernie (NoVA) 09:20:24 06/17/03 hhmmm... - Spee 10:23:48 06/17/03 Re: hhmmm... (n/m) - baddasstt 11:22:38 06/17/03 Re: hhmmm... - baddasstt 11:25:36 06/17/03 That's just not right. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 14:48:30 06/17/03 I stand corrected on my 2nd point....sorry for any confusion (n/m) - Dave N 13:23:47 06/17/03 its been repainted... - spyhunter 05:32:49 06/17/03 the Florida sun will do that - Spee 10:24:30 06/17/03 Kinda reminds me of the M3 story (n/m) - Evan(CA) 03:23:55 06/17/03 When I read "Miami" That's the first thing - NATAZ 03:28:12 06/17/03 that car is fucked - Zboost 07:28:05 06/17/03 Look at the square background around the print on the VIN - Michael (KC) 08:45:39 06/17/03 So quick to judge...The angle causes it to look different: - therinL 09:28:57 06/17/03 I think those are artifacts from crappy jpeg compression. (n/m) - CaptK(ATL) 10:01:44 06/17/03 "His name is Francisco Montoya, he works for the NASCAR - DR. E (Milwaukee) 11:03:56 06/17/03 link below...really worth another read... - DR. E (Milwaukee) 11:13:27 06/17/03 Yeah really. We should learn something from that post... - P Rock(OH) 11:20:17 06/17/03 nice quote, although inaccurate. - ni[X]it 11:27:20 06/17/03 Yeah, for legal reasons I should state that I was joking in - DR. E (Milwaukee) 11:37:13 06/17/03 Been repainted, shops can get/make labels like that. (n/m) - LordZ 13:34:49 06/17/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.