Subject	I thought they made 555's for all years, but the
Posted by	JMT-Z(St. Louis) on June 06, 2003 at 7:40 PM
	This message has been viewed 24 times.
In Reply To	I thought 555's required machining the lwr plenum for 95+ Zs posted by Bobby12many on June 06, 2003 at 07:18 PM
Message	740's were the ones that required machining on earlier models. "If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough." - Mario Andretti
Follow Ups	ZEMULATOR DYNO RESULTS....and DOOLZ as well Read----> - cant_z_me(OH) 18:57:21 06/06/03 the proof is in the pudding.. - fourZero 18:58:52 06/06/03 true....but i'm sure it won't... (n/m) - cant_z_me(OH) 19:01:00 06/06/03 yeah, I don't get it at all.. there's always going to be - fourZero 19:58:18 06/06/03 silent majority far outweighs the pessimistic (jealous) few (n/m) - cant_z_me(OH) 20:06:13 06/06/03 2nd (n/m) - DJPurpose(Sacto,CA) 20:08:09 06/06/03 I'm not silent, I've used his PROMs for quite some time - fourZero 20:10:07 06/06/03 really? - HalfnHalf702[HJC] 22:09:30 06/06/03 I've pulled my engine twice. 1st was because the machine - AshsZ (FabZEM All) 00:22:07 06/07/03 yes but why not get... - MrSex-Z 21:56:23 06/06/03 awesome dood - the_real_dummy 19:00:32 06/06/03 I assume stock turbos since I didnt see any in your profile - JMT-Z(St. Louis) 19:01:18 06/06/03 Re: I assume stock turbos since I didnt see any in your profile - J-Z91(OH) 19:06:37 06/06/03 Sorry, meant 740cc. I see your point, he's got aways to - JMT-Z(St. Louis) 19:10:12 06/06/03 I thought 555's required machining the lwr plenum for 95+ Zs - Bobby12many 19:18:58 06/06/03 I thought they made 555's for all years, but the - JMT-Z(St. Louis) 19:40:07 06/06/03 Correct. - ZBlacktt 21:26:43 06/06/03 you have it backwards... - Spee 21:59:39 06/06/03 *cough*...td05's...*cough* - cant_z_me(OH) 19:20:57 06/06/03 Hehe, nice. (n/m) - P Rock(OH) 22:06:38 06/06/03 Awesome results, there goes another high HP Z from Ohio. - J-Z91(OH) 19:03:15 06/06/03 17 psi run...a small spike to 18 for a sec (n/m) - cant_z_me(OH) 19:07:37 06/06/03 Cool, but dyno charts need to be posted for it to be - U ZCREAM 19:13:59 06/06/03 Read all.... (n/m) - John@Z1 19:16:51 06/06/03 I agree, wholeheartedly. (n/m) - AshsZ (FabZEM All) 01:32:14 06/07/03 I see u have 740's. smart move imho - aliaZ 19:24:45 06/06/03 Correct, hense why you see 3"ex on stock turbo's,,lol. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 19:37:46 06/06/03 congrats on the numbers man (n/m) - NR98 (in pieces) 19:26:26 06/06/03 Ok, looking at yours and a few others w/ his chip. - ZBlacktt 19:36:27 06/06/03 A/F was 11:1 and boost was 17 psi, bro (n/m) - cant_z_me(OH) 20:00:16 06/06/03 Cool, I read Ash'es write on on his chip and what it does :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 20:27:49 06/06/03 Running a little rich but better safe than sorry (n/m) - Rob'Z 21:01:27 06/06/03 Kinda sorta but controlled is the key. - ZBlacktt 21:20:52 06/06/03 11:1 is a very safe A/F for street cars. The timing is - AshsZ (FabZEM All) 10:12:48 06/07/03 What octane gas for the dyno runs? (n/m) - Wui (Philly) 21:15:38 06/06/03 Hit 387 rwhp on pump 93 and 410 on 100 unleaded. (n/m) - cant_z_me(OH) 00:02:31 06/07/03 nice numbers, congrats. (n/m) - Spee 22:02:23 06/06/03 if only you know. - Halo Z 07:16:34 06/07/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.