TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Autos are LESS efficient. (n/m)
Subject
Autos are LESS efficient. (n/m)
Posted by
Kenny (9 psi)
on June 04, 2003 at 1:47 PM
This message has been viewed
16
times.
In Reply To
I thought the auto was more efficient? like only 17% loss (n/m)
posted by KaZ (VaBch)
on June 04, 2003 at 12:17 PM
Message
Follow Ups
Dyno question-Whats my crank HP...
-
SOFLO
10:12:47 06/04/03
add 20% for driveline loss (n/m)
-
cant_z_me(OH)
10:14:54 06/04/03
I thought the auto was more efficient? like only 17% loss (n/m)
-
KaZ (VaBch)
12:17:16 06/04/03
Autos are LESS efficient. (n/m) -
Kenny (9 psi)
13:47:17 06/04/03
here's some reverse engineering foe yo ass
-
ZEngineer
10:20:45 06/04/03
pssst...he has mods.
-
Spee
10:29:03 06/04/03
nicely done. (n/m)
-
SactoTodd
10:30:48 06/04/03
how dare you question me?
-
ZEngineer
10:31:48 06/04/03
I think it was more like 204 HP. Ain't no NA I've seen w
-
PA_Z
10:56:58 06/04/03
Also, isn't the hp # for an engine released before the final
-
my91z
10:31:57 06/04/03
Same thing happened to Rustang Cobras a few years back.
-
PA_Z
10:58:14 06/04/03
PLease dont tell me you design buildings, or bridges
-
Borg79(ON)
10:32:26 06/04/03
lol,chill out people,I'm just working with the numbers given
-
ZEngineer
10:34:23 06/04/03
we see that...
-
Spee
10:35:54 06/04/03
I love Canada...
-
fourZero
10:39:42 06/04/03
lol...
-
Spee
10:44:17 06/04/03
I goto canadian skool,in ontario,must be the quebec skool:) (n/m)
-
Borg79(ON)
10:40:25 06/04/03
Hehe... I'm staying out of this one! :-P (n/m)
-
Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB)
11:42:04 06/04/03
:) (n/m)
-
Borg79(ON)
10:38:12 06/04/03
Right but....
-
BigTDogg
10:33:19 06/04/03
Thanks guys, so is it safe to say I have
-
SOFLO
11:15:14 06/04/03
Same formula as I posted, but here you go, I'm in a good moo
-
BigTDogg
11:20:08 06/04/03
Thanks for being in a good mood :) (n/m)
-
SOFLO
11:23:31 06/04/03
Damn...
-
D.E.S.A.T.S.
11:20:56 06/04/03
Re: Damn...
-
SOFLO
11:36:03 06/04/03
Mine made 197+ at the ECZA meet w/those mods+ECU
-
PA_Z
15:52:22 06/04/03
those are some pretty high dyno numbers
-
ENVYMYZ
11:26:25 06/04/03
how many miles are on it? those are great numbers. :) (n/m)
-
fairladyz90999
12:00:58 06/04/03
1990-46,000 original miles!
-
SOFLO
12:22:20 06/04/03
nice. those are awesome numbers. (n/m)
-
fairladyz90999
12:50:29 06/04/03
do you have any pictures of your car? (n/m)
-
fairladyz90999
13:25:53 06/04/03
Re: do you have any pictures of your car?
-
SOFLO
14:11:03 06/04/03
Thank you. Your car is a beauty. :) (n/m)
-
fairladyz90999
00:37:53 06/05/03
Hell, I think i dyno'd around 260rwhp NO NOS uncorrected...
-
Adlashwa
12:56:05 06/04/03
260rwhp-no NOS-No way!
-
SOFLO
13:08:51 06/04/03
I'll check the slips when i get home...but i'm positive it
-
Adlashwa
13:46:11 06/04/03
If it was with your mods maybe...good numbers though.
-
LordZ
14:18:57 06/04/03
LOL. (n/m)
-
Kenny (9 psi)
13:55:02 06/04/03
LOL...2nd (n/m)
-
SOFLO
14:13:17 06/04/03
Post a
Followup
You cannot reply to this message because you are not
logged in
.