Subject	Ahhhhh, ok.
Posted by	Marshall on June 02, 2003 at 9:56 PM
	This message has been viewed 18 times.
In Reply To	Here's a pic of MAF mounting location posted by Kez43 on June 02, 2003 at 09:41 PM
Message	That makes sense then. I was thinking that would be the only place that it would really work right, or else it would be just like a standard dual-pop. Hmm, seems interesting. Any pricing info?
Follow Ups	AshSPEC DOOLZ: More pictures for those interested: - AshsZ (FabZEM All) 20:26:06 06/02/03 get some pictures of the finished product - TARGETZ 20:29:43 06/02/03 Re: AshSPEC DOOLZ: More pictures for those interested: - smooth 20:37:42 06/02/03 Hwo about this one too AshsZ - govaardz(Aruba) 20:38:20 06/02/03 why? (n/m) - Guapo 20:41:00 06/02/03 also I forgot to add the TT injectors:-) (n/m) - govaardz(Aruba) 20:46:22 06/02/03 NAs don't need more air then a single pop & stock MAF will - YugoBernie (NoVA) 20:47:18 06/02/03 Ummm - 300zx300zx300zx 20:52:18 06/02/03 That would be what he elimated - unequal flow between sides (n/m) - Kez43 20:54:23 06/02/03 It would be easy to make it equal (n/m) - 300zx300zx300zx 21:49:29 06/02/03 No. Your A/F would be off by 50% because you won't have... - Kenny (10 psi) 23:28:04 06/02/03 Where does the MAF mount on this design? - Marshall 21:20:54 06/02/03 Here's a pic of MAF mounting location - Kez43 21:41:42 06/02/03 Ahhhhh, ok. - Marshall 21:56:50 06/02/03 Nothing yet, think he said 'cheaper than alternatives' tho (n/m) - Kez43 22:11:32 06/02/03 Upstream of the "X" - aliaZ 21:45:48 06/02/03 sign me up (n/m) - aliaZ 21:47:11 06/02/03 FMIC version 2....... (n/m) - NR98 (Ohio) 22:48:51 06/02/03 On the way =). (n/m) - Kenny (10 psi) 23:29:05 06/02/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.