Subject	yup (n/m)
Posted by	Tennyson (ATL) on May 30, 2003 at 9:15 AM
	This message has been viewed 11 times.
In Reply To	Last lighting I saw at the track was running 12.6 (n/m) posted by John@Z1 on May 30, 2003 at 08:52 AM
Message
Follow Ups	2002 Super charged Lightning vs Stage 3 300zxtt>> - BrianTT(TPA,FL) 07:27:54 05/30/03 Is the lightning stock? (n/m) - LRD VDR 07:40:25 05/30/03 Has pulley and supercharger. (n/m) - BrianTT(TPA,FL) 11:07:25 05/30/03 all new Lightnings have superchargers (n/m) - fourZero 11:16:45 05/30/03 What does he have done?, I raced one last summer - colocomp (CRUZ) 07:45:22 05/30/03 2nd. Look @ the coefficient of drag on that thing.. (n/m) - fourZero 10:48:13 05/30/03 Depends on what's done to it... >> - Greg (Dallas) 07:57:47 05/30/03 I whooped a stock one, but I'm higher than Stage III. (n/m) - MugenRacer 08:30:07 05/30/03 Re: 2002 Super charged Lightning vs Stage 3 300zxtt>> - Z-Freak 08:37:32 05/30/03 Last lighting I saw at the track was running 12.6 (n/m) - John@Z1 08:52:28 05/30/03 yup (n/m) - Tennyson (ATL) 09:15:30 05/30/03 I know a couple around here too. 12's all day. (n/m) - Arnel(Z32racing.com) 09:53:42 05/30/03 I keep with (and beat up on) my buddy regularly at stage 4 > - BigTDogg 09:23:08 05/30/03 Not sure if you're right on the year >> - sunrise089 12:44:17 05/30/03 Re: 2002 Super charged Lightning vs Stage 3 300zxtt>> - MyWhiteZTT(NJ) 09:40:48 05/30/03 i have a vid of the run if anyone can host ~2.6MB (n/m) - MyWhiteZTT(NJ) 12:36:24 05/30/03 I thought they run 13.7 stock and 5.2 to 60? - Naed 10:09:52 05/30/03 you're correct, but.... - sunrise089 12:41:06 05/30/03 Was it like this one !? >> - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 13:35:21 05/30/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.