Subject	Re: Only 320 at the crank? Isn't it more like...
Posted by	darnold.il on May 26, 2003 at 12:58 PM
	This message has been viewed 23 times.
In Reply To	320 (n/m) posted by genic on May 26, 2003 at 11:48 AM
Message	340hp at the crank on a manual trans and on an auto it would be 320hp ( since the auto has smaller turbos due to the bigger trans and as such only produces 280hp)?
Follow Ups	exaust and intake - kru- 10:56:01 05/26/03 What parts do you have now? (n/m) - Three00zx 11:06:00 05/26/03 "on my stock 300zx" (n/m) - Deja_Vu 11:26:00 05/26/03 I wouldn't recommend the HKS intake for a street driven car (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 11:12:13 05/26/03 2nd (n/m) - aliaZ 11:15:40 05/26/03 why not? (n/m) - imahurtchu 11:38:44 05/26/03 'Cause it doesn't filter for sh!t. Other products flow just - YugoBernie (NoVA) 11:44:14 05/26/03 link inside - aliaZ 18:24:44 05/26/03 320 (n/m) - genic 11:48:43 05/26/03 Re: Only 320 at the crank? Isn't it more like... - darnold.il 12:58:32 05/26/03 ok, maybe 330..exhaust(10), intake(10), testpipes(5) - genic 12:59:55 05/26/03 Stop ragging on the auto's, we don't have smaller turbos! - SooperZ95 13:56:44 05/26/03 I thought they do have smaller turbos? - Marshall 15:01:31 05/26/03 No. I don't know where that BS rumor started. look at the PN (n/m) - Black Mammoth (VA) 15:08:20 05/26/03 It started at Nissan, because it's true. As for the PN >> - Kez43 15:50:57 05/26/03 They do - different A/R, and thus they spool faster. (n/m) - Kez43 15:45:17 05/26/03 Yup. (n/m) - NIX600_HP_Z 16:18:31 05/26/03 Yes you do. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 16:47:57 05/26/03 2nd :) (n/m) - Funky (NWZ) 18:22:36 05/26/03 330hp. maybe? I do agree that it's difficult... - darnold.il 13:26:56 05/27/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.