| Message |
pulley and 11psi. According to the people at Vishnu, they think the dynojets inflate the numbers. I haven't heard how Mustang dynos compare, I was hoping someone here knew. (why I posted the brand name of the dyno) But then again, Vishnu only compares AWD output, so it's a bit of apples/oranges depending on how each of the brands handle the extra momentum of the front rollers. I'm sure just 2WD is a little more consistent. My wife's WRX turned 188 awhp, which is very close for the mods it has... but that was with the front rollers engaged. (AWD dyno, stock is around 160) I'm sure it probably has more to do with doing the proper calibration routines rather than the brand name, but I dunno. *shrug* Anyhow, if I were to guess a correction factor I would think around .99. The conditions weren't THAT good, but it was around 65deg and sunny. It was much warmer than the 50 deg or so that the miata guys had on Saturday. A Head/Cam mustang with a bunch of other "bolt-ons" ran 348rwhp. Does 11:1 compression count as a "bolt-on"? lol
|
 |
