Subject	But what was the Inj duty cycle?
Posted by	Christopher on February 18, 2003 at 11:27 PM
	This message has been viewed 91 times.
In Reply To	A couple notes for everyone......... posted by Specialty-Z on February 18, 2003 at 10:16 PM
Message	I did a run a couple of weeks ago and had the ConZult to log data. At peak the injector duty cycle was at 96% which is dangerously high, wouldnt you say? Here is a screen shot of the log link This was on stock inj with no ECU. Roughly at that point my A/F was 11.9 which is pretty good. I dont disagree with you and how everyone says you need to have this and that before you can make any hp. But having injectors would offer a margin of safety. Christopher
Follow Ups	Went to the dyno with Greg Dupree today! - degradated 20:03:48 02/18/03 cant read the little pictures (n/m) - LedZep(Ready for a TT) 20:10:00 02/18/03 holy shit. that is on STOCK turbos??? wow!! great work!!! (n/m) - Pure-Evil 20:14:15 02/18/03 397rwhp 444rwtorque??? are those SAE Corrected numbers??? - Pure-Evil 20:15:07 02/18/03 Shahram (LRD VDR) broke 400rwhp on his stock turbos - KILLR300ZX 20:19:24 02/18/03 ya, but did he have that high a number for RWTorque?? 444 is - Pure-Evil 20:28:19 02/18/03 That's because its the special 94 edition ;-) - ZHOUND 21:55:36 02/18/03 94s are the fastest... - TARGETZ 22:57:12 02/18/03 I did 400rwhp and 440ft.lbs of torque on stock turbos - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 20:31:54 02/18/03 wow. that is amazing...seriously HUGE numbers for stock - Pure-Evil 21:14:41 02/18/03 You had the 555cc's too right ;) lol - ZBlacktt 21:36:31 02/18/03 Stock turbos are stock turbos - U ZCREAM (TTZ in '03) 21:41:53 02/18/03 You missed the point van man ;) - ZBlacktt 22:01:17 02/18/03 yes those are sigma alpha epsilon corrected #s j/k ;-) (n/m) - SL103 20:50:55 02/18/03 very impressive, good job (n/m) - Zeus 20:15:58 02/18/03 Very awesome numbers dude! Congrats! (n/m) - Spee 20:50:09 02/18/03 Do I have to pay 25 cents to view and print the dyno sheet (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 20:54:00 02/18/03 Nope, I'll let ya do it for free. :) (n/m) - degradated 00:58:33 02/19/03 That's awesome bro :) - ZBlacktt 21:22:46 02/18/03 Re: That's awesome bro :) - ZHOUND 21:59:49 02/18/03 You might be kinda right :) - ZBlacktt 22:08:07 02/18/03 Re: That's awesome bro :) - degradated 02:00:42 02/19/03 Oh, I just seen the slicks on your sig and answered >> - ZBlacktt 13:30:19 02/19/03 Killer #'s for stock turbos! Congratz! (n/m) - Some Dude 21:27:33 02/18/03 Nice. - ZHOUND 21:53:29 02/18/03 Actually was thinking of some ET streets.. - degradated 00:57:07 02/19/03 Re: Actually was thinking of some ET streets.. - 91flz 06:26:26 02/19/03 A couple notes for everyone......... - Specialty-Z 22:16:42 02/18/03 what WOULD you reccommend for stock injectors/ic's/turbos - Pure-Evil 22:49:44 02/18/03 ahhh only if we could afford to run 101 octane all the time - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 23:16:39 02/18/03 Yep 91 octane sucks! (n/m) - Specialty-Z 23:19:31 02/18/03 Simple :) - Specialty-Z 23:17:43 02/18/03 But what was the Inj duty cycle? - Christopher 23:27:33 02/18/03 I would not say it is dangerously high...... - Specialty-Z 23:48:30 02/18/03 What was the EGT's, I guess in this case you could only >> - ZBlacktt 00:12:38 02/19/03 Ryan does not have EGT's on his car..... - Specialty-Z 00:28:23 02/19/03 Agreed - Christopher 00:18:27 02/19/03 Re: Agreed - Specialty-Z 00:37:00 02/19/03 91 octane = bad idea. - ZHOUND 11:20:26 02/19/03 91 octane was a typo, it was 93 (n/m) - Christopher 12:31:01 02/19/03 He wasn't "pulling" timing >> - ChristopherTheOne 10:47:25 02/20/03 Now fix mine so I can do it too :( - SeedyROM 01:46:25 02/19/03 Re: A couple notes for everyone......... - niXit 06:54:29 02/19/03 Congrats bro! (n/m) - SeedyROM 02:04:05 02/19/03 Nice!! (n/m) - Spongerider (Now PFC) 11:10:02 02/19/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.