Subject	Re: Which brings up the old debate, how much power can the s
Posted by	ZHOUND on February 03, 2003 at 12:29 PM
	This message has been viewed 69 times.
In Reply To	Which brings up the old debate, how much power can the stock posted by Chip(GinnMotorsports) on February 03, 2003 at 12:25 PM
Message	:Nissan Engine handle? Zo and Shawn say 700 HP, and I agree. I don't see why it won't handle 700rwhp. I'd do it myself but my turbos probably won't make much more than 650ish rwhp...maybe less. And I'm not big on nitrous either.
Follow Ups	Wondering who has 500+hp to the crank with dynos to prove it - TwinTurboPete 00:51:51 02/03/03 who cares...but for your boredom ---> - Zeus 01:00:19 02/03/03 269mph,, lol :( (n/m) - ZBlacktt 01:17:26 02/03/03 for some reason, my trackball mouse can't get passed 119mph (n/m) - Zeus 01:26:44 02/03/03 There is a bug in it.. i can hit 800's no problem:-) (n/m) - Stefen 02:01:48 02/03/03 444mph! is that a bad thing? (n/m) - inyrdrmz 15:11:10 02/03/03 baaah. 848 MPH. (n/m) - Altersys 01:38:03 02/04/03 500 crank? should be plenty, whp...not many (n/m) - Z-king 01:26:30 02/03/03 One of my mates is building a 700-800rwhp+ 300ZX - NitroPow 01:58:51 02/03/03 I made 426rwhp....do I qualify? - RUN-4-COVER 02:56:59 02/03/03 yeah, you should be over 500 at the crank. (n/m) - Snoguitar 03:02:28 02/03/03 I'll be hitting the dyno after the roads defrost - Turbodog (CT) 06:53:19 02/03/03 Greg(dallas) does. (n/m) - niXit 08:06:50 02/03/03 me! (n/m) - Bernie 09:11:24 02/03/03 I am close. 500FWHP = 410RWHP. (18% drivetrain loss) - AshsZ (FABio) 09:17:02 02/03/03 So really you haven't put down 410rwhp? (n/m) - Russ ZTT (Jax, Fl) 09:43:21 02/03/03 388HP@406ft/lbs with no IC airflow. They were heatsoaked - AshsZ (FABio) 10:02:03 02/03/03 So really you haven't put down 410rwhp? (n/m) - orion 10:36:58 02/03/03 ? did you read my post? (n/m) - AshsZ (FABio) 12:47:45 02/03/03 No, and you still dont have 500hp.. (n/m) - orion 16:16:33 02/03/03 Heh, a measly 36xHP under your belt with all those - AshsZ (FABio) 18:41:50 02/03/03 90hp loss in the drivetrain? (Eybrow is furled) - Turbodog (CT) 17:51:03 02/03/03 It is a theoretical value. I never said it was 100% true, - AshsZ (FABio) 18:36:30 02/03/03 Me too. (n/m) - CatDaddy(OKC) 09:37:18 02/03/03 With a conservative estimate of 25% drivetrain loss - FANTAZ(Power Supply Racing) 10:26:27 02/03/03 damn... 11.1 is damn fast for stock internals - down5hift 10:54:32 02/03/03 There are other cars making similar power on stock motor too - ZHOUND 11:00:23 02/03/03 Which brings up the old debate, how much power can the stock - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 12:25:19 02/03/03 Re: Which brings up the old debate, how much power can the s - ZHOUND 12:29:44 02/03/03 I will find out soon, 110K miles + 700 rwhp - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 12:36:04 02/03/03 Z-King pulled an 11.4 on a stock block... - X-STAT1C (Houston) 01:24:00 02/04/03 shit man! what kinda bolts on you have? (n/m) - Z. 16:08:50 02/03/03 I hate your sig man - aliaZ 21:51:02 02/03/03 Me :-) (n/m) - Good2Zya 13:50:00 02/03/03 433 RWHP here. Should be 500+ at crank. (n/m) - Joe (Ft. Laud) 15:59:13 02/03/03 Since he hasn't chipped in... timz makes 530rwhp. (n/m) - Jackie Chan (Hibernating) 17:34:11 02/03/03 I'll be there very soon... (n/m) - 1BADTTZ 20:09:31 02/03/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.