Subject	true :) (n/m)
Posted by	sbsTT(MD) on January 08, 2003 at 1:30 PM
	This message has been viewed 15 times.
In Reply To	you're too sly with that posted by HalfnHalf702[HJC] on January 08, 2003 at 01:26 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Unfortunately NZR: 0 to 60 in 2.5s and 300mph - goixiz 12:51:40 01/08/03 *sigh* (n/m) - U ZCREAM (TTZ in '03) 12:55:31 01/08/03 lol thats as old as this forum lmao (n/m) - gtclk 12:57:09 01/08/03 repost (n/m) - aliaZ 12:59:08 01/08/03 Aerodynamics will not allow that bike to do 300mph. - Russ ZTT (Jax, Fl) 13:02:10 01/08/03 hence the word 'theoretical.' (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 13:24:49 01/08/03 no way 2.5 no traction to launch that fast (n/m) - RT 13:14:38 01/08/03 Late 80's, early 90's litre bikes could do it in 2.7 secs (n/m) - my91z 13:17:30 01/08/03 They were not launching with 500 lb ft of torque, that - RT 13:21:28 01/08/03 check this one out too... - sbsTT(MD) 13:24:19 01/08/03 you're too sly with that - HalfnHalf702[HJC] 13:26:23 01/08/03 true :) (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 13:30:02 01/08/03 That's a sick f'ing bike. - KILLR300ZX 14:20:45 01/08/03 Top Fuel does 0-100 in one second (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 13:28:40 01/08/03 Or this one>>> - Pats300zx 13:30:35 01/08/03 0-60 in 2.5 is so NOT impressive... - LedZep(196.8 RWHP) 13:54:08 01/08/03 well, thats why it's impressive. - sbsTT(MD) 14:09:49 01/08/03 the most impressive part is that it actually works (n/m) - LedZep(196.8 RWHP) 14:25:31 01/08/03 actually, I'd like to see it turn :) (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 14:43:13 01/08/03 Looks just like this: - YugoBernie (NoVA) 14:57:52 01/08/03 lol (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 15:05:10 01/08/03 "Weighing only 1500 lbs" - Marshall 13:55:50 01/08/03 Yes!! Thanks for reposting V10 Chrysler publicity tool. :-) (n/m) - socos 14:47:29 01/08/03 I prefer this one...... - JMT-Z(St. Louis) 15:40:52 01/08/03 jay leno got one, at least this one can turn (n/m) - zkillionaire 18:09:50 01/08/03 Very clean ass on that tomahawk bike, nice lines. (n/m) - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 17:02:12 01/08/03 My prediction: This motorcylce will - dilo 20:47:41 01/08/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.