Subject	Re: After reading your site, I can see 400rwhp now,,LOL
Posted by	BigRob on January 06, 2003 at 1:28 PM
	This message has been viewed 74 times.
In Reply To	After reading your site, I can see 400rwhp now,,LOL posted by ZBlacktt on January 06, 2003 at 01:33 AM
Message	I just wanted a decent running car for the wife to drive. This is actually the car for her, not even my project...in theory. Besides, the upgrade was another $600 above and beyond the rebuild cost, and I'm glad I didn't spend it, since TEC did the work, and they rebuilt one turbo fine, but the passenger side one leaked from day one. I pulled the motor with 30 miles on it, had them check it..they said that maybe my restictor was missing from the line, or my return was blocked, so I put the stock turbo off my spare 96TT motor on it with the same line and return and it never leaked..so TEC can lick me where I S**T! Anyway, I assume you've seen the dyno sheet, but I will attempt to include it here...and there's been no head work done, other than a valve job..no porting, no polishing, no wacky extrude honing...new seals, bolt 'em up! same ol sticky valves and lifters... Just a swap meet K&N filter up front for $10 plus the adaptor, gutted precats, and away we go! Hey, I'd rather be lucky than good.
Follow Ups	Dyno results! Best stock turbo rwhp! - GRVNZ 22:11:42 01/05/03 Sounds great and all, but the proof is in the paper. - AshsZ (FABio) 22:13:29 01/05/03 No Problem! - GRVNZ 22:32:26 01/05/03 Dyno results can vary - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 22:30:12 01/05/03 16psi - GRVNZ 22:40:59 01/05/03 I would question the state of that dyno - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 23:06:17 01/05/03 My fault it was 1.16bar! (n/m) - GRVNZ 23:11:24 01/05/03 So that's 16.8 (n/m) - SeedyROM 23:25:15 01/05/03 I think that Dyno shop needs to calibrate there machine :) - ZBlacktt 23:36:13 01/05/03 Not enough knowledge to be skeptic... - GRVNZ 00:04:25 01/06/03 Whatever dude,,,, not buying it. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:08:53 01/06/03 well i would buy - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:12:42 01/06/03 Re: well i would buy - BigRob 00:35:34 01/06/03 oversize pistons? So your compression is not stock? (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:37:51 01/06/03 and please, don't think where ( I'm bashing anyone ) :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:38:55 01/06/03 You said the key phrase - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:42:19 01/06/03 Re: You said the key phrase - BigRob 00:54:30 01/06/03 Re: Re: You said the key phrase - BigRob 01:18:02 01/06/03 Cuda :) My first car Was 440/six pac Challenger (n/m) - ZBlacktt 01:23:33 01/06/03 Been posting this all day along :) ( lol ) - ZBlacktt 00:56:41 01/06/03 Re: Been posting this all day along :) ( lol ) - BigRob 01:06:43 01/06/03 Are you still going to sell it next year? :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 01:17:45 01/06/03 Re: Are you still going to sell it next year? :) - BigRob 01:23:06 01/06/03 After reading your site, I can see 400rwhp now,,LOL - ZBlacktt 01:33:24 01/06/03 Oh god, you had to go there. Sorry Rob but I told you :) (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 08:16:15 01/06/03 Re: After reading your site, I can see 400rwhp now,,LOL - BigRob 13:28:46 01/06/03 Well, it looks like stock turbo dyno.....lol - ZBlacktt 15:59:38 01/06/03 Re: Well, it looks like stock turbo dyno.....lol - BigRob 22:19:05 01/06/03 LOL - I hardly call 16.8 PSI pushed to the limit - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:10:12 01/06/03 I was unaware of the biiger bore, - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 00:23:50 01/06/03 Agreed - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:27:11 01/06/03 and............ - ZBlacktt 00:31:49 01/06/03 Dude, we're not flaming you. It's good to see that stock Z's - dilo 01:08:21 01/06/03 I think the correction factor gives bogus readings. - Marshall 03:33:07 01/06/03 How many times you going to post about correction factors? (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 08:17:16 01/06/03 Until idiots like you stop overlooking the basics. (n/m) - Marshall 21:42:21 01/06/03 Bwahahahahaa, good one. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 23:05:04 01/06/03 (That was just a cheap shot) - Marshall 01:04:59 01/07/03 yea didn't give it a thought until now....im sure thats what - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 12:02:40 01/06/03 YEP! Been there, done that, seen it several times. (n/m) - spotz 23:58:08 01/05/03 ok,ok is this that same Z with J-Spec motor from today? - ZBlacktt 22:40:36 01/05/03 No!!! - GRVNZ 22:53:10 01/05/03 Great,,,LOL, you've just busted one liar from there :( (n/m) - ZBlacktt 23:43:03 01/05/03 That's great. I was only able to manage 375rwhp (n/m) - Mike (La Canada) 22:44:41 01/05/03 TRI Z Racing- Denver, Colorado - GRVNZ 23:35:18 01/05/03 Seems kinda funny huh? - Lu87zxt 00:46:22 01/06/03 Well, he's second fastest :) and no there's not 40RWHP more - ZBlacktt 13:06:55 01/06/03 Excellent! How much torque? - degradated 22:53:33 01/05/03 468.5lb/ft of torque!!! (n/m) - GRVNZ 22:56:54 01/05/03 damn! (n/m) - degradated 23:05:51 01/05/03 That is amazing. My math says 491 fwhp. On stock turbos and - dilo 22:59:44 01/05/03 I got 489.7Hp, but yea, 370cc injectors huh?,, :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 23:03:09 01/05/03 1994-95 Models Stronger??? - GRVNZ 23:17:15 01/05/03 Way back in '95 i heard from one Nissan tech - sasha 23:57:26 01/05/03 thank you!!! (n/m) - GRVNZ 00:10:37 01/06/03 That has NOTHING to do with power potential with stock turbo - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 00:20:34 01/06/03 Sales pitch for that year :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:28:34 01/06/03 Sounds like someone is playing with the correction factor (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 00:35:12 01/06/03 I Think it is a record also! - GRVNZ 23:14:33 01/05/03 oh so its NOT your car LOL? - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:18:10 01/06/03 415.7rwhp@468.5lb/ft torque!! (n/m) - GRVNZ 23:22:42 01/05/03 what mods did it have? and how cold was it? (n/m) - hypo 00:17:59 01/06/03 Woody! Can you back this up, or dispute it? (n/m) - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 00:25:19 01/06/03 Which part? Lol. - Woody75 (Denver) 08:28:04 01/06/03 Bogus correction factors. - Marshall 03:35:40 01/06/03 Hey, let it be. - sparkie 13:37:33 01/06/03 Yea,,lol. As long as no one post a 10sec @ 130 on stockers (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:02:27 01/06/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.