Subject	Re: well i would buy
Posted by	BigRob on January 06, 2003 at 12:35 AM
	This message has been viewed 72 times.
In Reply To	well i would buy posted by SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) on January 06, 2003 at 12:12 AM
Message	Guess I'll jump in so you guys can abuse me too. My ugly ass looking car ran the other "disputed" figure of 407 rwhp. But I have to admit, as is in my other post, my timing was statospherically high (but I drove the car 70 miles to the dyno and 70 miles back without changing it), ran 107+ octane, and have a nice new, tight motor, with oversize pistons and good rods, and a Blitz D-SBC, which was set at around 17psi. Now I see everyone bashing the shop and the numbers, etc., but all the other non-modded Z's, the 350Z, the NA, not to mention another car club that pre-ceded us all had reasonable numbers, so why all of a sudden for 2 cars, or 3, the dyno is "off" by 50-100hp??? Hey, I'll be happy to re-dyno at another shop, and we'll see if the controversy continues, or if we can put this to rest. I give a lot of credit to my stock ECU maintaining a 12.5 A/F ratio which is a hell of a lot better than that low 11 crap the JWT ECU's dish out..Talk about a hp killer. I can't wait to dig into my 96TT now, to try and play catch-up with Mike L'C. That car ROCKS!!
Follow Ups	Dyno results! Best stock turbo rwhp! - GRVNZ 22:11:42 01/05/03 Sounds great and all, but the proof is in the paper. - AshsZ (FABio) 22:13:29 01/05/03 No Problem! - GRVNZ 22:32:26 01/05/03 Dyno results can vary - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 22:30:12 01/05/03 16psi - GRVNZ 22:40:59 01/05/03 I would question the state of that dyno - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 23:06:17 01/05/03 My fault it was 1.16bar! (n/m) - GRVNZ 23:11:24 01/05/03 So that's 16.8 (n/m) - SeedyROM 23:25:15 01/05/03 I think that Dyno shop needs to calibrate there machine :) - ZBlacktt 23:36:13 01/05/03 Not enough knowledge to be skeptic... - GRVNZ 00:04:25 01/06/03 Whatever dude,,,, not buying it. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:08:53 01/06/03 well i would buy - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:12:42 01/06/03 Re: well i would buy - BigRob 00:35:34 01/06/03 oversize pistons? So your compression is not stock? (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:37:51 01/06/03 and please, don't think where ( I'm bashing anyone ) :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:38:55 01/06/03 You said the key phrase - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:42:19 01/06/03 Re: You said the key phrase - BigRob 00:54:30 01/06/03 Re: Re: You said the key phrase - BigRob 01:18:02 01/06/03 Cuda :) My first car Was 440/six pac Challenger (n/m) - ZBlacktt 01:23:33 01/06/03 Been posting this all day along :) ( lol ) - ZBlacktt 00:56:41 01/06/03 Re: Been posting this all day along :) ( lol ) - BigRob 01:06:43 01/06/03 Are you still going to sell it next year? :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 01:17:45 01/06/03 Re: Are you still going to sell it next year? :) - BigRob 01:23:06 01/06/03 After reading your site, I can see 400rwhp now,,LOL - ZBlacktt 01:33:24 01/06/03 Oh god, you had to go there. Sorry Rob but I told you :) (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 08:16:15 01/06/03 Re: After reading your site, I can see 400rwhp now,,LOL - BigRob 13:28:46 01/06/03 Well, it looks like stock turbo dyno.....lol - ZBlacktt 15:59:38 01/06/03 Re: Well, it looks like stock turbo dyno.....lol - BigRob 22:19:05 01/06/03 LOL - I hardly call 16.8 PSI pushed to the limit - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:10:12 01/06/03 I was unaware of the biiger bore, - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 00:23:50 01/06/03 Agreed - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:27:11 01/06/03 and............ - ZBlacktt 00:31:49 01/06/03 Dude, we're not flaming you. It's good to see that stock Z's - dilo 01:08:21 01/06/03 I think the correction factor gives bogus readings. - Marshall 03:33:07 01/06/03 How many times you going to post about correction factors? (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 08:17:16 01/06/03 Until idiots like you stop overlooking the basics. (n/m) - Marshall 21:42:21 01/06/03 Bwahahahahaa, good one. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 23:05:04 01/06/03 (That was just a cheap shot) - Marshall 01:04:59 01/07/03 yea didn't give it a thought until now....im sure thats what - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 12:02:40 01/06/03 YEP! Been there, done that, seen it several times. (n/m) - spotz 23:58:08 01/05/03 ok,ok is this that same Z with J-Spec motor from today? - ZBlacktt 22:40:36 01/05/03 No!!! - GRVNZ 22:53:10 01/05/03 Great,,,LOL, you've just busted one liar from there :( (n/m) - ZBlacktt 23:43:03 01/05/03 That's great. I was only able to manage 375rwhp (n/m) - Mike (La Canada) 22:44:41 01/05/03 TRI Z Racing- Denver, Colorado - GRVNZ 23:35:18 01/05/03 Seems kinda funny huh? - Lu87zxt 00:46:22 01/06/03 Well, he's second fastest :) and no there's not 40RWHP more - ZBlacktt 13:06:55 01/06/03 Excellent! How much torque? - degradated 22:53:33 01/05/03 468.5lb/ft of torque!!! (n/m) - GRVNZ 22:56:54 01/05/03 damn! (n/m) - degradated 23:05:51 01/05/03 That is amazing. My math says 491 fwhp. On stock turbos and - dilo 22:59:44 01/05/03 I got 489.7Hp, but yea, 370cc injectors huh?,, :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 23:03:09 01/05/03 1994-95 Models Stronger??? - GRVNZ 23:17:15 01/05/03 Way back in '95 i heard from one Nissan tech - sasha 23:57:26 01/05/03 thank you!!! (n/m) - GRVNZ 00:10:37 01/06/03 That has NOTHING to do with power potential with stock turbo - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 00:20:34 01/06/03 Sales pitch for that year :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:28:34 01/06/03 Sounds like someone is playing with the correction factor (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 00:35:12 01/06/03 I Think it is a record also! - GRVNZ 23:14:33 01/05/03 oh so its NOT your car LOL? - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:18:10 01/06/03 415.7rwhp@468.5lb/ft torque!! (n/m) - GRVNZ 23:22:42 01/05/03 what mods did it have? and how cold was it? (n/m) - hypo 00:17:59 01/06/03 Woody! Can you back this up, or dispute it? (n/m) - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 00:25:19 01/06/03 Which part? Lol. - Woody75 (Denver) 08:28:04 01/06/03 Bogus correction factors. - Marshall 03:35:40 01/06/03 Hey, let it be. - sparkie 13:37:33 01/06/03 Yea,,lol. As long as no one post a 10sec @ 130 on stockers (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:02:27 01/06/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.