Subject	not IMHO (n/m)
Posted by	Altersys on December 18, 2002 at 2:28 AM
	This message has been viewed 16 times.
In Reply To	Increased is correct, but my question is "is it worth it?" (n/m) posted by Milo (San Antonio, TX.) on December 17, 2002 at 04:24 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Would something like this work for the Z's suspension? - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 10:44:52 12/17/02 *speachless* (n/m) - 2 Zweet 10:50:52 12/17/02 I was too when I saw it. (n/m) - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 11:00:25 12/17/02 Simply amazing! Too badass for words... But that FD is still - Bobby12many 11:01:27 12/17/02 That's a rocker arm setup.... - RSR 11:08:46 12/17/02 That, and why mess with a great suspension to begin with? (n/m) - stupidfast [ ///M Power ] 11:58:25 12/17/02 Thanx for the feedback, going to research a little more. (n/m) - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 13:56:59 12/17/02 wow....i just had to say something (n/m) - bfastrblast 11:58:56 12/17/02 why though? - Marshall 12:26:01 12/17/02 what's the point if there's room to begin with? - Altersys 13:09:42 12/17/02 Maybe unsprung weight is reduced? (n/m) - U LUZ(AZ) 13:24:03 12/17/02 more like increased... - Altersys 15:18:07 12/17/02 Increased is correct, but my question is "is it worth it?" (n/m) - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 16:24:18 12/17/02 not IMHO (n/m) - Altersys 02:28:41 12/18/02 Cool, but it might be a bit noisy in the cabin.. - Turbodog (CT) 15:23:11 12/17/02 They creek and give a strut pressure release sound, but - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 17:18:20 12/17/02 saw that a while ago - zkillionaire 19:11:26 12/17/02 here is somemore pics - zkillionaire 19:55:46 12/17/02 It's called a CANTILEVER system from what I understand..> - KingRameZX 22:32:04 12/17/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.