 |

  |
 |
| |
|
|
| Subject |
My opinion of B&B has takena nosedive recently |
 |
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
stupidfast [ ///M Power ] on December 10, 2002 at 9:17 PM |
 |
| |
This message has been viewed 72 times. |
 |
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
Hiper VS. B & B........Controversy settled posted by J-Z91(OH) on December 10, 2002 at 05:12 PM |
 |
| |
|
|
| Message |
I have had Greddy PE and B&B on my Z, I've had HKS, Brullen, AA, and other brands on various other cars. As far as the Z, the B&B looks fantastic, and sounds great. Maybe I'm just getting old(er), but the B&B is just too damn loud over time. And it's hard to justify the price vis-a-vis hp gains. Very rarely can anyone do back-to-back dynos in the real world, but 10hp is a HUGE difference for relatively similar conditions. FWIW, the B&B also produced, by far, the lowesr gains of any aftermarket cat-back for the M3. At this point, I wouldn't be willing to swallow the price difference simply for looks, and a headache. The Hiper does look like ass tho. Subjectively.
"Keep the shiny side up!" A memorial of sorts. Please visit Where do terrorists get their money? If you buy drugs, some of it might come from you. So says the State Dept ...and the DEA And a bit more
|
 |
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|