Subject	Re: 318 HP at the Rear. Is that GOOD? Look at my mods..
Posted by	1991TT300zx on November 09, 2002 at 8:36 PM
	This message has been viewed 87 times.
In Reply To	318 HP at the Rear. Is that GOOD? Look at my mods.. posted by 1991TT300zx on November 09, 2002 at 06:42 PM
Message	My Car has 45000 miles on the clock, im running on 93octane, and still have the pre cats soon to be replaced by downpipes. I dont think i have any boost leaks but keep in mind i was running on a Mustang Brand Dyno, The shop where I got the tests done say if i ran on a DYNOJET, i would post approx 11% more hp and torque.. DONT KNOW IF THAT IS TRUE I will find out next weekend. : I would like the members opinion on my dyno run. I have the following mods on the car. : JWT ECU : Greddy Intercoolers : HKS EVCIV : K&N Air intake : Stillen Test Pipes : Hks Exhaust : Running 1.1 BAR : The car put down 318.2 HP and 359.1 FT/LBS Torque : This DYNO run was done on a "MUSTANG brand DYNAMOMETER", not a DYNOJET.
Follow Ups	318 HP at the Rear. Is that GOOD? Look at my mods.. - 1991TT300zx 18:42:52 11/09/02 well, i would have expected more. i did 352rwhp/398lbs tq - Pure-Evil 18:48:12 11/09/02 Re: 318 HP at the Rear. Is that GOOD? Look at my mods.. - David 94TT 19:31:42 11/09/02 Wow, that dang impressive on pump gas and less PSI :) - ZBlacktt 20:05:37 11/09/02 Re: 318 HP on a Mustang Dyno Is that GOOD? Look at my mods.. (n/m) - 1991TT300zx 19:44:59 11/09/02 No way......... No way. :( - ZBlacktt 19:58:50 11/09/02 Re: 318 HP at the Rear. Is that GOOD? Look at my mods.. - 1991TT300zx 20:36:49 11/09/02 Re: Re: 318 HP at the Rear. Is that GOOD? Look at my mods.. - 1991TT300zx 21:25:24 11/09/02 sounds better, that puts you around - Schoch(NC State Red Z) 22:26:35 11/09/02 not really... I put out 332.5 RWHP and 373.0 RWTQ with just - Jodecy 22:27:25 11/09/02 You should make more power then that.... - 95zTT 02:31:19 11/10/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.