Subject	Re: wow, that sucks below 3,500 rpm
Posted by	morepower2 on October 17, 2002 at 4:31 PM
	This message has been viewed 114 times.
In Reply To	wow, that sucks below 3,500 rpm posted by madman99 on October 17, 2002 at 01:53 PM
Message	: guess it ain't a daily driver :P So 200 hp at 3500 rpm is bad? Thats way more than a stock TT at this point, it fact it is over two thirds of the power of a stock TT going full blast! The car has more nearly everywhere in the powerband, except maybe below 2000 rpm than a stocker. It is not laggy and not lacking for low end. Mike
Follow Ups	Project Z dyno result - georgeu2000 13:11:56 10/17/02 Re: Project Z dyno result - CaptanZap 13:15:50 10/17/02 wow, that sucks below 3,500 rpm - madman99 13:53:47 10/17/02 Who races on the street below 3500rpm? - ZHOUND 13:57:31 10/17/02 racing? I said as a daily driver - madman99 14:20:15 10/17/02 Personal experience. - ZHOUND 14:23:58 10/17/02 Re: racing? I said as a daily driver - morepower2 16:28:52 10/17/02 hmm...coming from a lowly stage I addict - madman99 16:49:30 10/17/02 What? I'f I'm not over 3500rpms then I'm not even driving:) (n/m) - Rob (Miami) 08:16:45 10/18/02 So lag does not matter? - George(boostsolutionsinc.net) 14:32:39 10/17/02 Re: So lag does not matter? - ZHOUND 14:38:05 10/17/02 Exactly, the power is on demand. Like - George(boostsolutionsinc.net) 14:54:50 10/17/02 Your power band will be much shorter though :( (n/m) - Seb 20:16:59 10/17/02 Well said..My thoughts exactly on the matter.. - Rob (Miami) 08:19:59 10/18/02 If he wanted that he'd have a Camaro :) (n/m) - SeedyROM 14:00:32 10/17/02 So does a stock TT (n/m) - Jackie Chan (Boosted) 14:07:00 10/17/02 dude, you cant even put gas in your car. what do you know? - genic 14:33:05 10/17/02 Oooh, touchy today - Jackie Chan (Boosted) 22:39:49 10/17/02 Re: wow, that sucks below 3,500 rpm - morepower2 16:27:25 10/17/02 Re: wow, that sucks below 3,500 rpm - morepower2 16:31:47 10/17/02 Mike don't worry he's just a madman wishing he had - Spongerider (Soon) 16:35:35 10/17/02 nah, I'm not a fan of dyno queens or 1/4 mile setups - madman99 16:45:18 10/17/02 If your talking about cars then all you have to look - Spongerider (Soon) 16:57:55 10/17/02 I'm not hating... - madman99 17:08:31 10/17/02 Next think before you open your TRAP!! - Spongerider (Soon) 10:07:01 10/18/02 well said. (n/m) - spotz 19:17:47 10/17/02 Re: nah, I'm not a fan of dyno queens or 1/4 mile setups - morepower2 17:07:10 10/17/02 sounds good, i've never seen or read anything on your car... - madman99 17:15:35 10/17/02 Re: sounds good, i've never seen or read anything on your ca - morepower2 17:21:03 10/17/02 Hmm...4400rpm full boost... - sparkie 17:24:53 10/17/02 Re: Hmm...4400rpm full boost... - morepower2 17:49:54 10/17/02 Re: Re: Hmm...4400rpm full boost... - sparkie 12:39:30 10/18/02 I agree - degradated 19:01:21 10/17/02 "If you have no lag, you have no turbos" - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 17:39:00 10/17/02 Nice write up :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 13:54:16 10/17/02 Nice. Your car? - ZHOUND 13:55:21 10/17/02 Mike Kojima..... (n/m) - KILLR300ZX 13:57:37 10/17/02 Project Z from SCC - Mike Kojima's (n/m) - CaptanZap 13:59:34 10/17/02 Your like me ( ??????? info, hello ) ,,,lol. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 14:07:06 10/17/02 I wishes! (n/m) - georgeu2000 14:33:50 10/17/02 I found a dyno sheet at the garage... - Flycaz 14:30:40 10/17/02 I found some pretzel crumbs on my desk... - madman99 15:15:13 10/17/02 exactly. (n/m) - Flycaz 15:28:02 10/17/02 Too lazy to look it up, what octane is C/16? (n/m) - Turbodog (CT) 09:29:12 10/18/02 117 oct VP C16 racing fuel. (n/m) - sparkie 12:28:23 10/18/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.