Subject	Re: Re: Nope...It's actually 100 to 200lbs heavier...
Posted by	Cap927 on August 29, 2002 at 11:27 AM
	This message has been viewed 42 times.
In Reply To	Re: Nope...It's actually 100 to 200lbs heavier... posted by Cap927 on August 29, 2002 at 11:24 AM
Message	: : I used to have a Firebird...basically the same car. The use a iron block as well. : This is what I found on the 2002 Camaro Z28SS. : Curb weight 3433lb (SS coupe) 3577lb (SS convertible) : Displacement 346/5.7L : Horsepower 325BHP@5200rpm : Torque LB-FT 350@4000rpm : Now I called a Chevy dealer and they told me that the Dale E. pkg is mostly cosmetics that if I want power I should just by the Corvette Z06 instead So now back to my coment, ones your done smoking his rectum, look at him in the eyes and ask him "NOW WHO'S YOUR DADDY BITCH!!!"
Follow Ups	I was just challenged by a former Boss who>> - NSANY(ATL) 10:03:25 08/29/02 I think its 383 to the crank. Also 383ci. Could be wrong. (n/m) - MattMc2281 10:11:06 08/29/02 Is that for a stock SS, or for the DEI car? - NSANY(ATL) 10:15:00 08/29/02 Stock SS is 330 HP Earn upgrades put it too 383 HP I think. (n/m) - MattMc2281 10:34:02 08/29/02 According to this site... - socos 10:45:06 08/29/02 The auto-dimming rearview mirror w/ compass adds 10rwhp (n/m) - J.R. (phx) 11:25:52 08/29/02 Stock LS1 number are bogus anyway - Marshall 11:21:04 08/29/02 If you race him.... - Mal1ce 10:13:09 08/29/02 Rubbin's racin', Son! (n/m) - boileralum00 10:14:06 08/29/02 As you spit a plug of tobbaco. (n/m) - zman92(ATL) 10:15:37 08/29/02 Hell naw! Reel min swalla da backy joos! (n/m) - boileralum00 11:53:01 08/29/02 Hell naw! Reel min swalla da backy joos! (n/m) - boileralum00 12:29:13 08/29/02 i was going to say that, but i feared it would be - Halo Z 10:31:45 08/29/02 LOL, very cold! (n/m) - RezidentEvil 10:54:59 08/29/02 Tell 'em 1 large and it's on. ;) (n/m) - kingtut(So.Cal) 10:31:54 08/29/02 i take it the car is running well? (n/m) - Halo Z 10:34:38 08/29/02 I can't get over 15psi b/c I have the wrong wastegate - NSANY(ATL) 11:52:18 08/29/02 on the road or on the dyno. - Halo Z 12:13:26 08/29/02 both (n/m) - NSANY(ATL) 12:21:37 08/29/02 ew that sux (n/m) - Halo Z 13:37:54 08/29/02 have u looked at what u have, u would win! (n/m) - 90TTKid 15:48:18 08/29/02 OH SHIT!! Just read your profile, The Z will prevail!! DO IT (n/m) - MattMc2281 10:35:42 08/29/02 Re: I was just challenged by a former Boss who>> - Cap927 10:45:39 08/29/02 uhh... i thought the Z-28 is lighter than a 300zx. (n/m) - TTony 10:59:24 08/29/02 Nope...It's actually 100 to 200lbs heavier... - Black Mammoth (VA) 11:05:30 08/29/02 Re: Nope...It's actually 100 to 200lbs heavier... - Cap927 11:24:08 08/29/02 Re: Re: Nope...It's actually 100 to 200lbs heavier... - Cap927 11:27:05 08/29/02 How is 3433 lbs 100 to 200 lbs heavier than 3475 lbs? - Marshall 11:49:14 08/29/02 Re: How is 3433 lbs 100 to 200 lbs heavier than 3475 lbs? - Cap927 12:05:33 08/29/02 I wouldn't say it's as heavy as a tank. - Marshall 12:08:11 08/29/02 Dont think they're that fast - sunrise089 13:39:32 08/29/02 2002 Z-28's run low 13's stock. (n/m) - TTony 14:09:01 08/29/02 You are wrong then. They ARE that fast. - Marshall 14:30:53 08/29/02 Ahem... - sunrise089 20:37:27 08/29/02 You are out of touch with reality. Educate yourself. - Marshall 21:16:56 08/29/02 not trying to argue for arguement's sake....but (long) - sunrise089 00:22:00 08/30/02 I mistake, sorry - sunrise089 00:24:43 08/30/02 about the geocities site: - Marshall 11:24:30 08/30/02 Re: not trying to argue for arguement's sake....but (long) - Marshall 11:53:49 08/30/02 Oh yeah- - Marshall 21:18:10 08/29/02 Check out this site: - Marshall 14:44:32 08/29/02 "former boss", so why not!? :-) (n/m) - FLY 1 (Dallaz) 10:52:24 08/29/02 Where can we buy those undisclosed turbos? :-\ - ZHOUND 11:11:56 08/29/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.