| Message |
I'm always arguiing with my friend on this one, since we always argue about pointless things. I can't see why he likes em so much, he can't see why I like Z's so much. I know this is a dumb question to begin with, but I dunno I just don't think they deserve to be classed with Z's, Rx-7's and Supras. On paper they look great. Cheap for a used one, good 0-60 1/4 times, good on skidpad. But I have heard they have poor build quality, are unreliable, crappy AWD system, and just all in all not very good cars. I dunno I think everyone goes through this stage, of wanting a Vr-4, I did, since you can get a fast japanese car for cheap. It would sure as hell be faster than an n/a Z, and just as much. I'm just wondering how they stack up to the others. Thanks P.S. They definitely can't compete in the looks department though:)
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" |
 |