Subject	AMEN anyone buying Z's read this or never bitch after buying (n/m)
Posted by	RT on August 08, 2002 at 7:05 AM
	This message has been viewed 30 times.
In Reply To	SOME ADVISE to all would be car buyers. posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on August 08, 2002 at 06:56 AM
Message
Follow Ups	test-drove a 91 TT last night...so disappointed... - BlueZ 05:35:16 08/08/02 Its not supposed to have more low end than your NA... - Mal1ce 05:43:42 08/08/02 I kinda figured that it takes a while b4 they spool - BlueZ 05:46:14 08/08/02 Your welcome to come up and drive mine anytime. - tystar 05:54:54 08/08/02 thanks I'll give that some thought! (n/m) - BlueZ 05:56:11 08/08/02 SOME ADVISE to all would be car buyers. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 06:56:43 08/08/02 AMEN anyone buying Z's read this or never bitch after buying (n/m) - RT 07:05:01 08/08/02 Can we add this as an addition to the FAQ? Good info! (n/m) - boileralum00 08:23:25 08/08/02 Pick up this month's Issue of STUFF, it has YUGO mania (n/m) - chivas 10:18:25 08/08/02 Werd. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 10:27:09 08/08/02 faq!!! (n/m) - Z06-KILLR 10:23:01 08/08/02 gonna test drive another tonight..keeping my fingers crossed (n/m) - BlueZ 07:22:27 08/08/02 Yes TTs have much less low end than NAs - jayZbird 09:17:08 08/08/02 The NA has a 4.09 rear end, while TT has a 3.69 rear end - teahead 09:47:22 08/08/02 I thought n/A's had 4.10's and TT's had 3.86's. (n/m) - ZFreak (Omaha) 10:54:54 08/08/02 teahead is correct. (n/m) - not-hrz 11:14:50 08/08/02 A stock TT is not THAT fast.. - Jackie Chan (Boosted) 10:32:50 08/08/02 perhaps I should pick up a vette.. (n/m) - BlueZ 05:28:15 08/09/02 No such thing as a Maroon or Slow TTZ (In good condition) - Kamaitachi (Dokuzetsu) 11:55:03 08/08/02 When I drove a TT for the first time I noticed the lack in.. - Three00zx 12:05:57 08/08/02 Re: When I drove a TT for the first time I noticed the lack - Three00zx 12:11:11 08/08/02 What? - Marshall 16:53:37 08/08/02 A stock TT isn't much faster than an NA anyhow. (n/m) - Thomas(Houston) 13:35:57 08/08/02 It's almost 2 seconds faster in the 1/4 - Marshall 16:59:42 08/08/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.