Subject	An NA Z is worse at accelerating than a TT Z. So it is bad? (n/m)
Posted by	boileralum00 on August 01, 2002 at 12:23 PM
	This message has been viewed 28 times.
In Reply To	Saying "worse" implies there's something bad about the first (n/m) posted by Z-Jay (Edmonton) on August 01, 2002 at 12:10 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Uh oh, the 350Z may be competition for the NA supra! - Janders7(KilleenTX) 09:52:47 08/01/02 NA supra with NOS maybe. (n/m) - sparkie 10:03:08 08/01/02 i just bought that magazine yesterday, i am still reading - Neo Corleone 10:13:25 08/01/02 NA Supra is worse than NA Z. (n/m) - ZMANIAK 10:18:31 08/01/02 What you meant to say was: NA Z is better than the NA Supra (n/m) - T R M (Tampa) 10:20:10 08/01/02 If one is better the other has to be worse. He was correct (n/m) - RT 10:26:57 08/01/02 Saying "worse" implies there's something bad about the first (n/m) - Z-Jay (Edmonton) 12:10:10 08/01/02 An NA Z is worse at accelerating than a TT Z. So it is bad? (n/m) - boileralum00 12:23:06 08/01/02 not if its running and the TT isn't ;-) (n/m) - Guapo 12:29:10 08/01/02 Nice call:) (n/m) - RezidentEvil 13:04:44 08/01/02 Ever seen a supra the looks are worse and the NA>> - RT 12:32:54 08/01/02 The only thing an NA Supra is good for is - Jackie Chan (Boosted) 12:40:56 08/01/02 No - also good as whipping b*tch for NA Zs:) (n/m) - RezidentEvil 13:06:40 08/01/02 bahh - Halo Z 10:51:01 08/01/02 Lesson #17 in life: Ignore Supraforums.com - SeedyRom 11:39:04 08/01/02 I thought that was rule #1 lol (n/m) - RT 12:09:14 08/01/02 Nope. Rule #1 - There's Always a Bastard! (n/m) - boileralum00 12:23:52 08/01/02 LOL forgot about that one But rule one is in rule 17>> - RT 12:33:51 08/01/02 Rule #2: if its not a Z, it's just another car! (n/m) - Tedzbaby 13:41:29 08/01/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.