Subject	brakes are cheaper than transmissions. (n/m)
Posted by	SactoTodd on June 04, 2002 at 10:56 AM
	This message has been viewed 16 times.
In Reply To	yeah, I looked that that before, you could always machine> posted by my91z on June 04, 2002 at 08:02 AM
Message
Follow Ups	How about a 13.1" (332mm) brake upgrade for $400 w/rotors? - AshsZ (Fab Whore, Ph.D) 07:51:57 06/04/02 that sounds like a great deal, wish i had the scrap for it (n/m) - CLuBKiD_300ZX 07:56:16 06/04/02 Ahem. Those rotors are $339... EACH. (n/m) - John Y(Houston) 07:57:20 06/04/02 i just noticed that one, a little too steep for me (n/m) - CLuBKiD_300ZX 07:59:22 06/04/02 But DIZZAM! That would be a hella nice set of rotors. :) (n/m) - AshsZ (Fab Whore, Ph.D) 08:18:11 06/04/02 It's just a replacement part for the Brembo big brake kit. - John Y(Houston) 09:07:27 06/04/02 Ash, you do know that price is per rotor right? - alcky 07:57:54 06/04/02 Yeah, I noticed that afterwards. :-/ Owell.. Sigh.. (n/m) - AshsZ (Fab Whore, Ph.D) 07:58:37 06/04/02 yeah, I looked that that before, you could always machine> - my91z 08:02:35 06/04/02 You are sparing a $40 set of pads for your $2k transmission - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 10:36:24 06/04/02 2 words: "revmatched downshifts" - my91z 11:14:23 06/04/02 I would still push in the clutch and use the brakes - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 11:31:14 06/04/02 I very rarely take my car out of gear. Only when sitting> - my91z 11:41:12 06/04/02 brakes are cheaper than transmissions. (n/m) - SactoTodd 10:56:25 06/04/02 also bell is not included either. thats just the disk (n/m) - TARGETZ 08:09:23 06/04/02 No bigger brakes for me until I can afford a larger - boileralum00 08:48:15 06/04/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.