Subject	wow 79% efficiency at some points. Nice. (n/m)
Posted by	MugenRacer on April 10, 2002 at 5:23 PM
	This message has been viewed 23 times.
In Reply To	Also PE1820 map posted by Chip(GinnMotorsports) on April 10, 2002 at 03:36 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Bad pic (from fax) PE1420 compressor map vs. TDO5H-16G - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 15:33:36 04/10/02 Also PE1820 map - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 15:36:50 04/10/02 if only i knew how to read these, lol (n/m) - RaBBiZ 16:01:59 04/10/02 wow 79% efficiency at some points. Nice. (n/m) - MugenRacer 17:23:56 04/10/02 what is m3/min ? I only know lbs per minute lingo (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 17:51:21 04/10/02 http://www.digitaldutch.com/unitconverter 1m^3= ~35 cfm (n/m) - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 18:12:52 04/10/02 Yeah, but can their downpipes fit our test pipes? (n/m) - teahead 16:21:42 04/10/02 No turbo kits fit our test pipes. - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 16:31:57 04/10/02 So the PEs come w/DPs, but are usesless? Bah! (n/m) - teahead 18:30:41 04/10/02 As are the HKS and Greddy downpipes! (n/m) - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 18:46:15 04/10/02 Are you an idiot? If you can afford a big turbo kit you>> - MugenRacer 20:09:46 04/10/02 It narrows out considerably with the more flow... - nixit 19:32:09 04/10/02 Only thing they have on 16G is slightly higher efficiency - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 19:49:20 04/10/02 Also factor in the other costs >>> - wesman [92TT-less ] 21:12:21 04/10/02 Also...these are BB turbos >>> - wesman [92TT-less ] 21:14:42 04/10/02 I cannot believe that BB's can't sustain high boost... - nixit 21:34:01 04/10/02 I think I got misinterpreted > - kZtt (zedparts.com) 09:01:38 04/11/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.