Subject	unless it's a binary pricing model...
Posted by	madman99 on April 09, 2002 at 11:31 AM
	This message has been viewed 14 times.
In Reply To	Then it needs be be based on actual bandwidth used. posted by MugenRacer on April 09, 2002 at 10:51 AM
Message	something similar to cell phone usage where it's either being used or not with some base rate just for having the account. I'd agree though, thinking through the flow concept like power or water, bandwidth should be based on usage plus some minimum "access charge" for being hooked into the network. sorry. I'm not a smurf pimp any more. (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 00:00:18 02/07/02 preluber. or postluber. - ni[X]it 22:03:35 01/03/02
Follow Ups	NZR -- But Internet related "Time Warner to charge by Usage" - [-TRM in TPA-] 07:13:07 04/09/02 Does not sound like a big deal 4 the average person (n/m) - Good2Zya 07:18:45 04/09/02 Well, it does when you DL movies and music daily - [-TRM in TPA-] 07:40:16 04/09/02 Which in itself is not exactly legal. - MugenRacer 10:42:26 04/09/02 that's a bunch of crap! - Marshall 09:32:44 04/09/02 same as every other business... - madman99 10:24:56 04/09/02 Then it needs be be based on actual bandwidth used. - MugenRacer 10:51:39 04/09/02 unless it's a binary pricing model... - madman99 11:31:43 04/09/02 Cable sucks! :P (n/m) - SeedyRom 12:33:11 04/09/02 another reason why time warner sucks, I got the dish and>> - Got Boost? 20:42:15 04/09/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.