Subject	Then it needs be be based on actual bandwidth used.
Posted by	MugenRacer on April 09, 2002 at 10:51 AM
	This message has been viewed 14 times.
In Reply To	same as every other business... posted by madman99 on April 09, 2002 at 10:24 AM
Message	With that reasoning people that use it very little should pay very little, while people that use it more pay more. Something similar to the Electric meter on the side of every house. If you are using the equivalent of 14.4kbps of your available bandwidth you only pay for that. If you are using the full 256k or whatever you have, then you pay the full price. The problem with home users is that there are no SLA (Service Level Agreements) with the Provider.
Follow Ups	NZR -- But Internet related "Time Warner to charge by Usage" - [-TRM in TPA-] 07:13:07 04/09/02 Does not sound like a big deal 4 the average person (n/m) - Good2Zya 07:18:45 04/09/02 Well, it does when you DL movies and music daily - [-TRM in TPA-] 07:40:16 04/09/02 Which in itself is not exactly legal. - MugenRacer 10:42:26 04/09/02 that's a bunch of crap! - Marshall 09:32:44 04/09/02 same as every other business... - madman99 10:24:56 04/09/02 Then it needs be be based on actual bandwidth used. - MugenRacer 10:51:39 04/09/02 unless it's a binary pricing model... - madman99 11:31:43 04/09/02 Cable sucks! :P (n/m) - SeedyRom 12:33:11 04/09/02 another reason why time warner sucks, I got the dish and>> - Got Boost? 20:42:15 04/09/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.