Subject	Why is the HP and Torque so far off? 700/370!? (n/m)
Posted by	DamonH 90TT on October 10, 2000 at 10:51 PM
	This message has been viewed 11 times.
In Reply To	Holy frickin crap! posted by Maximamike™ on October 10, 2000 at 07:14 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Holy frickin crap! - Maximamike™ 19:14:41 10/10/00 Holy frickin crap!!! is right, god i want that (n/m) - Zhow+go 19:17:30 10/10/00 700 hp at 1000 rpm, hahaha (n/m) - craZy 19:20:30 10/10/00 Re: 700 hp at 10,000 rpm instead (n/m) - AgentZ 22:47:46 10/10/00 Is that 300 and something pounds of torque, isn't that >>> - ZBlacktt 19:31:25 10/10/00 Ahhh, its only a four-banger! I at least want a 6! BAHAHAHA! (n/m) - Zster 20:09:32 10/10/00 looks like a v8 to me (n/m) - toyluvr 20:14:28 10/10/00 same here but i went to school in tx, i might be wronge (n/m) - HALO Z(GA) 20:26:52 10/10/00 oops, my bad! It is an 8, but a very small one. :) (n/m) - Zster 20:31:29 10/10/00 I would get it, But it doesn't fit under the hood.LOL (n/m) - Amir (SF Bay Area) 20:14:02 10/10/00 hmmm i wonder how hard it would be to do that. - HALO Z(GA) 20:41:39 10/10/00 im gueesing tough with those 8 carbon fiber things on top (n/m) - Z Dreamer 22:06:37 10/10/00 Why is the HP and Torque so far off? 700/370!? (n/m) - DamonH 90TT 22:51:33 10/10/00 all high-po NA engines are like that... - Mr.TT 00:08:48 10/11/00 @ 14.3:1 comp. ratio your gonna need to run 100+ oct. gas :) (n/m) - snoguitar 01:59:55 10/11/00
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.