Subject	18's and yes. (n/m)
Posted by	Scott (ZofNC) on March 09, 2002 at 12:12 AM
	This message has been viewed 17 times.
In Reply To	What looks better?Opnions posted by serv40 on March 09, 2002 at 12:05 AM
Message
Follow Ups	What looks better?Opnions - serv40 00:05:31 03/09/02 18's and yes. (n/m) - Scott (ZofNC) 00:12:15 03/09/02 What performs better as far as handling? (n/m) - 90Z32TT 00:16:26 03/09/02 18's have less sidewall, better cornering. (n/m) - CRuNK™ 00:17:58 03/09/02 are you sure? - Gluge 00:21:22 03/09/02 I was comparing to stock 16's (n/m) - CRuNK™ 00:42:58 03/09/02 W/ 18"s, you have a tradeoff. More weight/size= slower accel (n/m) - LoveBone 00:35:11 03/09/02 speaking of, do you know how much >>> - CRuNK™ 00:45:12 03/09/02 30 lbs. more or less. (n/m) - LoveBone 00:58:23 03/09/02 43 lbs. (n/m) - Wui (Philly) 05:53:04 03/09/02 With 18's, having such a narrow sidewall means you're - dilo 14:45:18 03/09/02 why not 18x10's in back? (n/m) - Gluge 00:21:54 03/09/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.