TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Its probably 2540.
Subject
Its probably 2540.
Posted by
ZHOUND
on January 30, 2002 at 10:23 PM
This message has been viewed
67
times.
In Reply To
There is no way they got 600# and only 570 rwhp
posted by Chip(GinnMotorsports)
on January 30, 2002 at 08:54 PM
Message
2540s will make the 570ish rwhp I think with the boost he mentioned in the for-sale post.
Follow Ups
NE1 hear of garrett HKS GT3540 turbos??? wolf has
-
MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z)
19:43:52 01/30/02
I was wondering why he was using 110 octane with 900cc
-
CarlCuro (busted...again)
19:48:09 01/30/02
I was wondering if it was his,,,,LOL (n/m)
-
ZBlacktt
20:11:04 01/30/02
The octane has nothing to do with the injector size >>>
-
wesman [92TT-less ]
20:48:25 01/30/02
By the high torque (600) I would guess similar to yours. (n/m)
-
Chip(GinnMotorsports)
20:09:48 01/30/02
a 3540 shoudl be HUGE. mike's are big, but i have heard of
-
Jefe
20:19:59 01/30/02
I wondered the same >>>
-
wesman [92TT-less ]
20:45:12 01/30/02
There is no way they got 600# and only 570 rwhp
-
Chip(GinnMotorsports)
20:54:32 01/30/02
yea that's a good point
-
Jefe
21:25:05 01/30/02
Its probably 2540. -
ZHOUND
22:23:27 01/30/02
now that would make sense :) (n/m)
-
wesman [92TT-less ]
22:40:57 01/30/02
except for the 900cc injectors :) that's WAAAY overkill (n/m)
-
Jefe
23:05:25 01/30/02
doesn't hurt, if tuned right (n/m)
-
Jjzx (Black and Blue/3.5k)
23:24:45 01/30/02
ooohhh yes it does
-
StEaMyZ(ZtoyZ.NET©)
02:27:47 01/31/02
the torque at that boost doesn't sound right (n/m)
-
MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z)
23:24:06 01/30/02
2540 = Piece of shit (n/m)
-
MikeeZ
09:37:17 01/31/02
why selling so soon, maybe the lag on those are
-
MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z)
20:56:59 01/30/02
Mike, what is the holed up on your set up.
-
SWEET Z
20:58:41 01/30/02
Re: Mike, what is the holed up on your set up.
-
MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z)
22:04:29 01/30/02
Those are F*CKING HUGE... bigger than Paisly's HKS twins...
-
97 S14
04:32:49 01/31/02
*nod* GT40, think a T04E compressor, but more efficient >
-
MikeeZ
11:26:38 01/31/02
Post a
Followup
You cannot reply to this message because you are not
logged in
.