Subject	yes, Torque is more desirable. your torque falls of
Posted by	ni[x]it on January 13, 2002 at 6:39 PM
	This message has been viewed 32 times.
In Reply To	Thanks... I think... LOL >>> posted by Michael(Dallas) on January 13, 2002 at 02:46 PM
Message	: The 324rwhp run was w/ the timing set to 17 degrees. The latter ~340rwhp runs were w/ the timing set to 19 degrees. And they were done in May 2001 in ~80 degree weather w/ mild humidity. I'm thinking about dynoing again in TX Summer heat w/ the timing at 21 degrees to see if it can handle it ok. : BTW, I always thought that flat tq curves were better than flat hp curves...? Consider that after hp peaks (and flattens out), your *probably* isn't going to accelerate anymore...? : Cheers! : Michael. gradually... IDEALLY, your Torque will peak at 5,500, and drop off very slowly, while the turbos come to full spool, with HP rising slightly until 7Krpm.
Follow Ups	I Looked on TTZD.com but i couldn't find one, i need a dyno - shawn300z NEVER gonna have TT 13:04:27 01/13/02 here> - timz 13:11:04 01/13/02 Thanks dude! (n/m) - shawn300z NEVER gonna have TT 13:16:14 01/13/02 Here's mine... - Michael(Dallas) 13:56:31 01/13/02 FANTASTIC dyno chart Doan...FLAT Rwhp...just the way it's - ni[x]it 14:13:54 01/13/02 Thanks... I think... LOL >>> - Michael(Dallas) 14:46:13 01/13/02 yes, Torque is more desirable. your torque falls of - ni[x]it 18:39:50 01/13/02 I thought you wanted to torque line to be flat? (n/m) - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 15:00:38 01/13/02 thanks again! - shawn300z NEVER gonna have TT 14:15:23 01/13/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.