Subject	0-60 mph, sec 5.8 Quarter mile, sec/mph 14.2/98.1 (n/m)
Posted by	®HaloZ™ on October 20, 2001 at 2:53 AM
	This message has been viewed 13 times.
In Reply To	Unless your NA runs 14s in the 1320 and 5s in 0 to 60 posted by TTurboZ(Sacto, CA) on October 20, 2001 at 02:09 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Honda S2000 Vs. N/A 300ZX - azwinder 23:50:09 10/19/01 Prolly not the 300zx, Possibly from a roll, still doubtful (n/m) - Bobby12many(Captain Annoying) 23:57:26 10/19/01 no way s2000's are crap i've raced two and they suck. - spunkeologist 01:20:23 10/20/01 So why are they crab? Please elaborate... - TTurboZ(Sacto, CA) 02:18:38 10/20/01 hha your kidding, s2000 are awesome, better than Most NAs - Firesauce300zx 03:49:34 10/20/01 The S2000 should take it - Marshall 00:04:19 10/20/01 LOL. Nissan vs. Honda. WHY ask??? stg III NA, ur gone! (n/m) - sureshot 00:18:32 10/20/01 but there tourq sux 150flbs... (n/m) - ®HaloZ™ 00:18:51 10/20/01 yeah, you need to rev the hell out of them - Marshall 00:30:07 10/20/01 depends on the driver, the cars themselves are pretty close (n/m) - Jjzx (Black and Blue/3.5k) 00:48:47 10/20/01 depends on the driver - NoSuchSol 02:09:52 10/20/01 Unless your NA runs 14s in the 1320 and 5s in 0 to 60 - TTurboZ(Sacto, CA) 02:09:37 10/20/01 0-60 mph, sec 5.8 Quarter mile, sec/mph 14.2/98.1 (n/m) - ®HaloZ™ 02:53:55 10/20/01 Honda S2000 takes it unless you're mod'd (n/m) - Aseem 02:49:37 10/20/01 s2000 is a good race for TT (low 14's in quarter). (n/m) - maverick (NYC) 11:44:01 10/20/01 I have a video of it. I'll upload it. (n/m) - TTony 13:22:13 10/20/01 here's the link of a S2000 vs. a non-turbo Z. - TTony 14:02:20 10/20/01 Good driver - S2000 (most S2000 drivers -> NA) (n/m) - Dpilati 14:34:50 10/20/01 S2K no question - crZ32 17:38:09 10/20/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.