Subject	Can Anyone show proof of those times? cause i find it
Posted by	gtclk (UK) on September 18, 2001 at 11:25 AM
	This message has been viewed 16 times.
In Reply To	You're both wrong. 2.8 (n/m) posted by JaimeZX™ on September 18, 2001 at 10:52 AM
Message	hard to believe, although very impressive if it is that quik :
Follow Ups	Stage X Zers - Mike@ZSpeed 05:30:28 09/18/01 0-60 in low to mid 2's. (n/m) - F8IZHIS 05:40:05 09/18/01 mid 2s?! Mid 3s is what I can believe. Not mid 2s. - Keepsake 06:05:38 09/18/01 Mid 2's ?? what are you smoking? - gtclk (UK) 06:58:29 09/18/01 I believe the Cheetah (Tim Liess) had a 3.6 to 60 on his TT. (n/m) - SpdDemon13 (Baltimore) 07:29:48 09/18/01 i remember 2.9 0-60 (n/m) - damaged(pittsburgh) 07:43:47 09/18/01 You're probably right :) (n/m) - SpdDemon13 (Baltimore) 08:28:28 09/18/01 You're both wrong. 2.8 (n/m) - JaimeZX™ 10:52:39 09/18/01 Can Anyone show proof of those times? cause i find it - gtclk (UK) 11:25:15 09/18/01 Just do searches. The Cheetah did a 10.6 or somethin'. (n/m) - JaimeZX™ 16:12:48 09/18/01 Tim did 2.9 sec 0-60. (n/m) - presto 11:25:40 09/18/01 reality = high 3's low 4's w/perfect launch. - twinz 07:26:45 09/18/01 Actually quite easy to get into mid- hi 2s 0-60... - sparkie 09:23:14 09/18/01 60ft time doesnt necessarily translate to 60mph time.> - twinz 10:04:41 09/18/01 I guess to prove or disprove is to actually do it. :) (n/m) - sparkie 12:16:48 09/18/01 It's traction limited - CarlCuro (Z-less) 09:46:56 09/18/01 All will be different depending on set up (n/m) - wesman [92TT-less ] 10:02:28 09/18/01 a stage x z wont get beat on the street.. - NIXTA TTZ(knock sensors suck) 11:49:29 09/18/01 That's all I wanted to hear :P (n/m) - Mike@ZSpeed 07:00:06 09/19/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.