| Message |
was that it's a semi-progressive set-up because I wanted to inquire about the springs I had purchased from them. I didn't know the spring rate on mine and so I called to find out what default spring rate they use. They use a 350/250 and I also thought that the springs were linear(because of the way the coil was wound) but the guy there told me it was semi-progressive. As for the dual spring set-up the tender spring is totally, progressive. It's in the June 2000 issue of SCC, "We used Eibach progressive ERS tender springs for the front and rear. The front tenders are 200/250/300in/lb progressive while the rear springs are 150/200/200 progressive." That was quote in the article by Mike Kojima. Even he says they are progressive. You can even see the number's on the side of that coil in your pic. So you can see that it's a progressive spring. I don't know about the stiff spring being semi-progressive but since the single spring set-up uses the same type of spring found in the dual spring set-up I am guessing it would be the same as the single spring. Being that they are made by Eibach it makes sense that they would be progressive but since the way the coil was wound looks linear it would be believable to say it might be semi-progressive since it doesn't look progressive at all. Just quoting what Ground Control, told me when I asked them info about my springs and I have the single set-up. Maybe it's just another way for them to make a sales pitch I don't know, just a quote from them, that's all.
Regards,
Jeff
|
 |
