TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - hold on there.
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject hold on there.
     
Posted by SactoTodd on August 16, 2001 at 12:34 PM
  This message has been viewed 17 times.
     
In Reply To Where have you been, any stock NSX is slower than a TTZ>> posted by Zster on August 16, 2001 at 12:26 PM
     
Message first you say "Although I'm not a subscriber to mag stats" but in the same sentence you say "go look up some old motor trends, and look for yourself".

I think that Car & Driver is VERY consistent in their testing.

The newer NSXs are as fast if not faster than a C5 Vette. I've yet to see a stock TT Z beat a C5.

You mention the torque of the NSX, but you fail to mention the weight (or lack there of) of it.

Todd (no reaction time, but getting better 14.0 @ 99)
246 ground pounding horsies
264 earth shattering pound feetsies

'91 TT 36,050 miles
'89 Mazda 323 GTX New Daily Driver (mods: intake, exhaust, re-wired fuel pump, adjustable shocks, big brake kit, stainless steel lines) AKA "The Rally Car"
'67 Galaxie 500 Old Daily Driver, with $700 in brake mods, no compression on cyls 5 & 6. For sale. AKA "The POS ford"

The "For when I get a bigger garage" list:

'70 240Z - it started it all
'79 RX-7 - best follow up car
'71 Honda S600 - they are so damn cute
'66 GT350H - Rental cars are so cheap!
'69 Boss 302 - Why not?
'86 SVO - best handling Mustang ever
'90 Q45 - M5s and E55s cost a bit much
'95 RX-7 - but only in Silver
'91 TTZ - word - PURCHASED

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.