TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Chronologically, yes, but that would be a harsh departure
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject Chronologically, yes, but that would be a harsh departure
     
Posted by Woodnutz (PA) on August 13, 2021 at 7:57 AM
  This message has been viewed 207 times.
     
In Reply To Why? 400Z would fit in w/ chronological nomenclature. (n/m) posted by Gordo LSZ Daytona on August 13, 2021 at 07:35 AM
     
Message from the dispacement-driven nomenclature throughout the history of the Z. Especailly given the high level of traditionalism rolled into the design intent of the car, I really have a hard time with them breaking from that.

If it's a 400Z, sure... that would be a disappointment, but if the name makes/breaks it for someone on the car, they've got problems. The TT 3.0l with a true manual gearbox is what's got me fired up about it.

- Aaron

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.