Subject	The upper RPM range is where these turbos really shine
Posted by	The Hawk on January 12, 2017 at 9:26 AM
	This message has been viewed 486 times.
In Reply To	Is the boost response/lag any better than GT28RS? posted by ZXoltan on January 11, 2017 at 08:41 AM
Message	Although, decent gains can be had down low as well. SZ has tuned plenty of cars with these turbos and have posted their results, some of which go back several years ago. Take a look at those and your q's will be answered...
Follow Ups	Ok so the GTX Gen 2's look nice...... - Stanky 21:14:30 01/09/17 Re: Ok so the GTX Gen 2's look nice...... - Dsouthz32 00:20:26 01/10/17 40psi?! (n/m) - WhiTTe Z 08:43:58 01/10/17 Yup it was 40 psi at around 4200rpm (n/m) - Stanky 09:18:37 01/10/17 What will the stock head gasket hold? (n/m) - SammybTT(TN) 11:39:50 01/11/17 Pretty sure that was on OEM headgaskets - Stanky 11:51:55 01/11/17 They last. Ask Greg Dupree. (n/m) - MixManMash 13:19:04 01/11/17 All you can throw at it. (n/m) - The Hawk 09:23:34 01/12/17 The new 2860's huh? Nice! (n/m) - shiers69 09:46:46 01/10/17 I so want them to get the GTX into a 25 frame - BlackholeZ 18:29:25 01/10/17 Easily done. Just turn the boost down. And I bet you could - MixManMash 07:41:31 01/11/17 The point is trading the top end power (that I don't want) - BlackholeZ 01:12:57 01/13/17 I don't find my GTX2860s any slower to respond than the - MixManMash 08:14:45 01/15/17 Yes, and that's awesome - BlackholeZ 16:11:08 01/15/17 Is the boost response/lag any better than GT28RS? - ZXoltan 08:41:53 01/11/17 The upper RPM range is where these turbos really shine - The Hawk 09:26:28 01/12/17 Yes, but these are the new generation 2 GTX turbos. - MixManMash 09:46:03 01/12/17 GT2860rs compared to GTX2863 - Zsgetyoulaid 11:30:42 01/12/17 All other factors the same between cars? - ZXoltan 14:50:45 01/12/17 Yep, even difference in cylinder head work could be all the - MixManMash 20:21:55 01/12/17 2863s do spool slower than 2860s. (n/m) - MixManMash 20:19:09 01/12/17 Re: 2863s do spool slower than 2860s. - BLACKBEAST 04:46:19 01/15/17 I saw the opposite here. A local member swapped from 2860s - MixManMash 08:18:57 01/15/17 Re: I saw the opposite here. A local member swapped from 2860s - BLACKBEAST 16:23:02 01/15/17 Same here. Looking to beat 340 ft lbs at 3000 rpm - not4resaleZ 11:42:15 01/11/17 Re: Ok so the GTX Gen 2's look nice...... - TigerZ_MO 08:02:36 01/11/17 Pretty impressive. Like to see the pull from 2500 rpm. (n/m) - not4resaleZ 11:47:19 01/11/17 Why? It obviously is powerless in that range... - The Hawk 09:23:06 01/12/17 Not necessarily true. Some big turbo cars have power in - MixManMash 09:45:09 01/12/17 It looks to have about 340 ft lbs at 3000 rpm - not4resaleZ 09:58:07 01/12/17 Re: It looks to have about 340 ft lbs at 3000 rpm - supergoji 13:26:13 01/20/17 Wrong - BlackholeZ 01:15:57 01/13/17 "powerless" is a relative term..... - The Hawk 12:21:06 01/13/17 What's amazing about the new VR30DDTT is the - not4resaleZ 12:39:47 01/13/17 PS....if u spend +100hrs on your heads, you can have that to (n/m) - The Hawk 12:41:19 01/13/17 Did they do a pump gas run? - nzryan 15:17:51 01/12/17 Would be interesting to see these Gen 2s vs classic disco - Stanky 17:23:27 01/12/17 Low power is mainly due to MJ's heads...... - The Hawk 12:43:42 01/13/17 You mean low end (RPM) power, right? (n/m) - MixManMash 08:32:16 01/14/17 Yes..... - The Hawk 11:32:00 01/14/17
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.