Subject	Pretty impressive. Like to see the pull from 2500 rpm. (n/m)
Posted by	not4resaleZ on January 11, 2017 at 11:47 AM
	This message has been viewed 417 times.
In Reply To	Ok so the GTX Gen 2's look nice...... posted by Stanky on January 09, 2017 at 09:14 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Ok so the GTX Gen 2's look nice...... - Stanky 21:14:30 01/09/17 Re: Ok so the GTX Gen 2's look nice...... - Dsouthz32 00:20:26 01/10/17 40psi?! (n/m) - WhiTTe Z 08:43:58 01/10/17 Yup it was 40 psi at around 4200rpm (n/m) - Stanky 09:18:37 01/10/17 What will the stock head gasket hold? (n/m) - SammybTT(TN) 11:39:50 01/11/17 Pretty sure that was on OEM headgaskets - Stanky 11:51:55 01/11/17 They last. Ask Greg Dupree. (n/m) - MixManMash 13:19:04 01/11/17 All you can throw at it. (n/m) - The Hawk 09:23:34 01/12/17 The new 2860's huh? Nice! (n/m) - shiers69 09:46:46 01/10/17 I so want them to get the GTX into a 25 frame - BlackholeZ 18:29:25 01/10/17 Easily done. Just turn the boost down. And I bet you could - MixManMash 07:41:31 01/11/17 The point is trading the top end power (that I don't want) - BlackholeZ 01:12:57 01/13/17 I don't find my GTX2860s any slower to respond than the - MixManMash 08:14:45 01/15/17 Yes, and that's awesome - BlackholeZ 16:11:08 01/15/17 Is the boost response/lag any better than GT28RS? - ZXoltan 08:41:53 01/11/17 The upper RPM range is where these turbos really shine - The Hawk 09:26:28 01/12/17 Yes, but these are the new generation 2 GTX turbos. - MixManMash 09:46:03 01/12/17 GT2860rs compared to GTX2863 - Zsgetyoulaid 11:30:42 01/12/17 All other factors the same between cars? - ZXoltan 14:50:45 01/12/17 Yep, even difference in cylinder head work could be all the - MixManMash 20:21:55 01/12/17 2863s do spool slower than 2860s. (n/m) - MixManMash 20:19:09 01/12/17 Re: 2863s do spool slower than 2860s. - BLACKBEAST 04:46:19 01/15/17 I saw the opposite here. A local member swapped from 2860s - MixManMash 08:18:57 01/15/17 Re: I saw the opposite here. A local member swapped from 2860s - BLACKBEAST 16:23:02 01/15/17 Same here. Looking to beat 340 ft lbs at 3000 rpm - not4resaleZ 11:42:15 01/11/17 Re: Ok so the GTX Gen 2's look nice...... - TigerZ_MO 08:02:36 01/11/17 Pretty impressive. Like to see the pull from 2500 rpm. (n/m) - not4resaleZ 11:47:19 01/11/17 Why? It obviously is powerless in that range... - The Hawk 09:23:06 01/12/17 Not necessarily true. Some big turbo cars have power in - MixManMash 09:45:09 01/12/17 It looks to have about 340 ft lbs at 3000 rpm - not4resaleZ 09:58:07 01/12/17 Re: It looks to have about 340 ft lbs at 3000 rpm - supergoji 13:26:13 01/20/17 Wrong - BlackholeZ 01:15:57 01/13/17 "powerless" is a relative term..... - The Hawk 12:21:06 01/13/17 What's amazing about the new VR30DDTT is the - not4resaleZ 12:39:47 01/13/17 PS....if u spend +100hrs on your heads, you can have that to (n/m) - The Hawk 12:41:19 01/13/17 Did they do a pump gas run? - nzryan 15:17:51 01/12/17 Would be interesting to see these Gen 2s vs classic disco - Stanky 17:23:27 01/12/17 Low power is mainly due to MJ's heads...... - The Hawk 12:43:42 01/13/17 You mean low end (RPM) power, right? (n/m) - MixManMash 08:32:16 01/14/17 Yes..... - The Hawk 11:32:00 01/14/17
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.