Subject	Owner thought they were +12, but wasn't sure. Seems like
Posted by	evan_aggie on November 14, 2013 at 4:16 PM
	This message has been viewed 233 times.
In Reply To	+30 rears then (n/m) posted by lidz on November 14, 2013 at 03:27 PM
Message	you guys think +30.
Follow Ups	Guess the offsets of these LMGT4s! - evan_aggie 14:50:43 11/14/13 Do you know the widths? - lidz 15:10:51 11/14/13 18x8.5 front and 18x9.5 rear. (n/m) - evan_aggie 15:24:19 11/14/13 +30 rears then (n/m) - lidz 15:27:49 11/14/13 Owner thought they were +12, but wasn't sure. Seems like - evan_aggie 16:16:18 11/14/13 can you test fit? - lidz 16:19:16 11/14/13 If they are +30 np. If they are +12, I agree. (n/m) - evan_aggie 16:30:03 11/14/13 Ask for a couple more photos maybe? - lidz 00:11:55 11/15/13 The more I compare, I think the rear are +12. They look - evan_aggie 10:22:43 11/15/13 +12 would stick out FARTHER than +30 (n/m) - ConVerTT 12:12:52 11/15/13 ? The rims yes, but the amount of "concaveness" would be - evan_aggie 13:09:36 11/15/13 ridiculously cheap - lidz 14:53:55 11/15/13 Ahh misunderstood. Gotcha! (n/m) - ConVerTT 23:43:17 11/15/13 25 front 30 rear i believe (n/m) - JRFITZ 15:37:58 11/14/13 Sunken battleship on 370z = Will fit on 300zx (n/m) - ZinnZ32 15:43:53 11/14/13 take one off and measure - LJZTT 17:46:29 11/14/13 They are 90 mi away. (n/m) - evan_aggie 19:01:30 11/14/13 bummer - LJZTT 23:14:11 11/14/13 Re: Guess the offsets of these LMGT4s! - zomsin 00:55:34 11/15/13
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.