Subject	The USSC has held checkpoints to not violate 4th amend
Posted by	ForceFedTT (SoCal) on October 23, 2013 at 10:41 PM
	This message has been viewed 159 times.
In Reply To	How this is allowed is beyond me posted by ZXRider on October 23, 2013 at 03:38 PM
Message	This is an exception to the rule and IMO is unfair because it's not being performed the purpose of public saftey or under exigent circumstances. Public health? Yes. But the remote affects on public health are not crucial enough to infringe fundamental rights IMO.
Follow Ups	Random Mobile smog check points. - Machtavian 13:08:40 10/23/13 Where was it located? (n/m) - ZXRider 13:12:32 10/23/13 I thought LA was the only county doing mobile smog... - -Grimm- 13:22:20 10/23/13 woah wtf?! they actually do this? - fuzzymonkey 15:11:03 10/23/13 How this is allowed is beyond me - ZXRider 15:38:24 10/23/13 Not correct. - GatorJ 18:12:15 10/23/13 it is still not in keeping with 4th amendment principle - LJZTT 18:37:57 10/23/13 Agree with you there! - Z DNA 18:52:19 10/23/13 Not really the same thing, almost but one major difference - LJZTT 19:17:17 10/23/13 I agree with you. The excuse I've heard is that driving - zellamay 22:53:19 10/23/13 The do this under the same... - Z DNA 18:42:02 10/23/13 The USSC has held checkpoints to not violate 4th amend - ForceFedTT (SoCal) 22:41:17 10/23/13 You have the right to refuse!!! - Basedd_z32tt 17:50:27 10/23/13 Re: Random Mobile smog check points. - Feenix 17:35:37 10/24/13 Ridiculous. Californians (the people that I have met) seem - ConVerTT 17:59:04 10/24/13
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.