Subject	You could have just said inferior, haha (n/m)
Posted by	vulcanrush on August 04, 2013 at 7:09 PM
	This message has been viewed 154 times.
In Reply To	Why an LS? It's a far less superior engine than the VG IMO. (n/m) posted by TTZ2NV(EPTmotorsports) on August 04, 2013 at 01:18 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Caution! SACRILEGIOUS BEHAVIOR CONTEMPLATED - Zorpman 15:17:22 08/03/13 I have been thinking the same. - smartone 21:54:26 08/03/13 Broken link (n/m) - Zorpman 23:44:47 08/03/13 I like my core support in 1 piece. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 00:35:09 08/04/13 Why an LS? It's a far less superior engine than the VG IMO. (n/m) - TTZ2NV(EPTmotorsports) 13:18:50 08/04/13 Simple. Huge aftermarket support. Less costly go-fast - MixManMash 16:32:04 08/04/13 You could have just said inferior, haha (n/m) - vulcanrush 19:09:36 08/04/13 Never use a large word when a diminutive word will do (n/m) - vorpalZ 00:06:23 08/05/13 LS engines are... - Zorpman 20:20:48 08/04/13 Re: Caution! SACRILEGIOUS BEHAVIOR CONTEMPLATED - WazTTed 17:46:43 08/04/13
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.