 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
Hey Ron, I had the exact exhaust set-up you described (long) |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
lil'abner on July 16, 2013 at 4:04 PM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 280 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
2.5" to 3" exhaust loudness difference posted by RonZ300 (Socal) on July 16, 2013 at 03:46 PM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
including coverting from 2.5 to 3 inch up to the cat-back where I stayed with a 2.5 inch cat-back. The way I look at it, the closer you are to the engine, the more bang you are going to get out of going to 3 inch. I think Greg Dupree will agree that 95+% of the performance benefit from going to a 3" exhaust is made before the cat-backs. So you will be happy and save some serious coin if you keep you 2.5" cat-back, and the sound should be nice with resonators and high flow cats. Quiet enough when cruising, nice rumble when you step on it. With that said, I would be hypocritical if I did not tell you that my next exhaust will be all three-inch, to the tips of the tailpipes. I am obsessing on that last "5%." Oh yeah, don't forget that your mid-pipe flanges have to be 3" on upstream side, and 2.5" on the cat-back side.
|
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
15:57:51 07/16/13
