Subject	yes. (n/m)
Posted by	Woody75 (Denver) on October 23, 2012 at 11:32 AM
	This message has been viewed 57 times.
In Reply To	But the Rear sub-frames are identical correct? (n/m) posted by KongZTT GT28RS MD on October 22, 2012 at 07:18 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Will an entire rear subframe assembly from a 2+0 to 2+2? - BlackholeZ 11:27:38 10/19/12 yes they interchange (n/m) - KongZTT GT28RS MD 11:38:47 10/19/12 Sweet. This makes my life much easier. (n/m) - BlackholeZ 11:43:48 10/19/12 They are both NA subframes right? (n/m) - KongZTT GT28RS MD 11:45:46 10/19/12 Yeah (n/m) - BlackholeZ 13:00:16 10/19/12 Yup.. then you are good to go (n/m) - KongZTT GT28RS MD 14:52:37 10/19/12 I know a TT to NA subframe is different (parts) - Jayru 13:35:49 10/19/12 Yes. (n/m) - Antihero 13:41:15 10/19/12 Thanks. (n/m) - Jayru 13:53:36 10/19/12 Re: Will an entire rear subframe assembly from a 2+0 to 2+2? - ryzan 16:16:17 10/19/12 He's only swapping the rears subframe.. not the whole car.. - KongZTT GT28RS MD 16:31:40 10/19/12 Well I was going to swap the handles - BlackholeZ 20:08:21 10/19/12 I seem to remember having to swap the e brake cables. - TheSlimOne (DFW) 20:27:29 10/19/12 I could've swore the rear subframes for 2+2 and 2+0 are - KongZTT GT28RS MD 20:32:38 10/19/12 Well I'll double check and report back (n/m) - BlackholeZ 21:05:15 10/19/12 This would make sense since the 2+2 is longer than 2+0 (n/m) - Jayru 21:12:09 10/19/12 Yes but that doesn't mean the mounting points on subframe - KongZTT GT28RS MD 21:18:17 10/19/12 Right. He said swap E brake cables - Jayru 22:29:00 10/19/12 Meaning the 2+2 and 2+0 rear subframes are the same. - KongZTT GT28RS MD 11:31:09 10/21/12 Ebrake cables are indeed longer on the 2+2. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 09:52:01 10/22/12 But the Rear sub-frames are identical correct? (n/m) - KongZTT GT28RS MD 19:18:26 10/22/12 yes. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 11:32:45 10/23/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.