Subject	Re: 89mm
Posted by	MikeC(NZ) on August 21, 2012 at 5:49 AM
	This message has been viewed 246 times.
In Reply To	89mm posted by BLACK Z on August 21, 2012 at 01:30 AM
Message	I also had a few blocks sonic tested a few blocks and they have very little meat on them. We bored a block just 1mm over and it caused me grief. Then we sonic checked a further 5 blocks and only two would take even a light over-boring. Sure you can get lucky on a street engine but the risks are not worth it IMHO. The JUN kit using the 91mm pistons require sleeves. I corresponded with JUN and they advised that I would have to sleeve the block to get the 3.2L There is also no real point, the extra power from 3litre to 3.2litre is like 1psi of boost. Thought the JUN crankshaft is nice.
Follow Ups	Overbored to 3.3L - Jiro 10:44:10 08/20/12 the previous owner is lying to you. - aliaZ 11:08:59 08/20/12 2nd. (n/m) - SimaYi 13:30:30 08/20/12 Biggest 3rd ever! (n/m) - The Hawk 15:02:23 08/20/12 That's something you check before buying. (n/m) - SactoTodd 11:37:39 08/20/12 Isn't the engine from IPP? Can't you check with Kyle? (n/m) - Aqualung 11:57:43 08/20/12 Er... You ask to see the receipts (n/m) - vorpalZ 12:58:59 08/20/12 maybe he meant 3.2 (n/m) - mikehawkhertz 13:33:24 08/20/12 Re: maybe he meant 3.2 - Antihero 13:42:50 08/20/12 JUN stroker kit, and no radiator shroud FTW!! (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 14:32:11 08/20/12 I was wrong here. 92 unsleeved isn't going to happen (n/m) - Antihero 07:32:04 08/21/12 still unlikely with a stock stroke - aliaZ 14:49:10 08/20/12 I have 3.2L - sparkie 15:39:48 08/20/12 Devin was sleeved, right? (n/m) - Antihero 16:07:55 08/20/12 I think he sold the kit before finishing it - aliaZ 16:26:23 08/20/12 No. It was not sleeved. (n/m) - sparkie 21:59:37 08/20/12 are you thinking about this kit? - aliaZ 23:56:10 08/20/12 Pretty sure it was 93mm back then. - sparkie 00:49:03 08/21/12 i think he had 92 sleeved on a build before the paeco one. - Antihero 07:04:37 08/21/12 ok...do you know the acceptance criteria on the sonic test? - aliaZ 16:28:04 08/20/12 Re: ok...do you know the acceptance criteria on the sonic test? - sparkie 22:32:42 08/20/12 And the non-thrust side can be a little thinner. (n/m) - sparkie 00:46:03 08/21/12 are these numbers before or after boring the block? - aliaZ 05:34:35 08/21/12 I found a few threads about this.... - aliaZ 06:03:45 08/21/12 Those were before numbers - sparkie 10:59:07 08/21/12 Another factor to consider... - sparkie 16:23:08 08/21/12 you'd be crazy to go as low as .060" - aliaZ 16:47:44 08/21/12 Re: you'd be crazy to go as low as .060" - BLACK Z 01:36:13 08/22/12 yep...core shift can be pretty bad (n/m) - aliaZ 10:02:44 08/22/12 Maybe the seller meant 3.03, not 3.3 - i_s_64 15:00:43 08/20/12 And getting the VG30DE bored out to 92mm is - i_s_64 15:07:45 08/20/12 Re: Overbored to 3.3L - ali300zx 16:01:26 08/20/12 88mm = 3.03L - aliaZ 16:25:36 08/20/12 Re: 88mm = 3.03L - sky z 17:28:55 08/20/12 overbored to 3.03L nice thanks man (n/m) - Jiro 22:04:27 08/20/12 89mm - BLACK Z 01:30:28 08/21/12 Re: 89mm - sky z 04:59:28 08/21/12 Re: 89mm - MikeC(NZ) 05:49:25 08/21/12 agree 100% - aliaZ 06:08:46 08/21/12 Re: Re: 89mm - BLACK Z 07:15:16 08/21/12 Re: Overbored to 3.3L - sky z 07:03:19 08/21/12 Re: Overbored to 3.3L - sky z 06:57:31 08/22/12 ouch (n/m) - aliaZ 10:04:01 08/22/12 lol (n/m) - ZiNnYc 07:22:53 08/22/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.