Subject	unless you're going to develop the capabilities of a 16-bit
Posted by	aliaZ on July 05, 2012 at 1:36 PM
	This message has been viewed 104 times.
In Reply To	Sacrificing MAP and 16-bit+ capabilities? Not likely. posted by OverZealous (CT) on July 05, 2012 at 12:28 PM
Message	ecu yourself, I wouldn't consider it an upgrade. Not sure what the boost sensor is used for, but it isn't MAP in the traditional sense. Good luck with it
Follow Ups	Racelogic Traction Control ECU Code 51 Potential Solution - OverZealous (CT) 14:18:00 07/04/12 you'd probably be better off by upgrading to an 8-bit ecu - aliaZ 18:14:08 07/04/12 Sacrificing MAP and 16-bit+ capabilities? Not likely. - OverZealous (CT) 12:28:13 07/05/12 unless you're going to develop the capabilities of a 16-bit - aliaZ 13:36:13 07/05/12 There are no tunes available for 16 bit ECUs unless - DVDBURN (MD) 14:04:47 07/05/12 Agreed (n/m) - ztunerz 18:46:51 07/05/12 Why would Nissan limit boost at WOT cruise speeds only using - OverZealous (CT) 22:21:24 07/05/12 Geez, Google it already! - DVDBURN (MD) 09:43:00 07/06/12 Google says MAP sensor adds little to no value. Makes sense. - OverZealous (CT) 19:53:51 07/06/12 Yep, that's the only real benefit of using a MAP sensor IMO. - DVDBURN (MD) 22:34:42 07/06/12 Open injector code 51 is in CA ECUs prior to 1995. - DVDBURN (MD) 19:31:05 07/04/12 Right, I can probably ignore the light but - OverZealous (CT) 12:35:11 07/05/12 Re: Racelogic Traction Control ECU Code 51 Potential Solution - Mike Broadbent 04:09:41 07/06/12 Re: Racelogic Traction Control ECU Code 51 Potential Solution - Mike Broadbent 05:39:34 07/06/12 Thanks Mike. TC is working with molex & CEL on. ABS?? - OverZealous (CT) 15:32:39 07/07/12 FWIW all 1995 16bit TT ECUs are considered Cali Spec. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 22:14:24 07/08/12 Interesting. Thanks Bernie. Curious how you know this. (n/m) - OverZealous (CT) 06:48:40 07/09/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.