Subject	agreed on the ECU
Posted by	aliaZ on May 20, 2012 at 6:26 AM
	This message has been viewed 91 times.
In Reply To	The "new style" ECU is not an asset for the '95 posted by ZXoltan on May 20, 2012 at 04:51 AM
Message	much more choices in ECU tunes if you swap in an earlier ECU
Follow Ups	94, 95, or 96? - dvice 23:32:47 05/19/12 Go for a 95 if you can find it. - Draker (Eugene, OR) 23:50:49 05/19/12 heads & ports are updated in 95 as well - there is more - Bernie (NoVA) 16:23:11 05/21/12 not 96... - WhiTTe Z 01:32:24 05/20/12 Its still a great car, '96 is fine. (n/m) - johnnysombrero 10:26:16 05/21/12 The best year is one that has been taken care of (n/m) - Piranha 02:23:37 05/20/12 2nd (n/m) - njz 06:31:09 05/20/12 The "new style" ECU is not an asset for the '95 - ZXoltan 04:51:06 05/20/12 agreed on the ECU - aliaZ 06:26:32 05/20/12 Re: 94, 95, or 96? - KA8 10:21:51 05/20/12 95 is ideal. - Drk93TT 22:12:58 05/20/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.