Subject	As Greg said...
Posted by	PiotrC70 on April 16, 2012 at 10:46 PM
	This message has been viewed 443 times.
In Reply To	Re: Huge difference. posted by Poom (Pittsburgh) on April 16, 2012 at 09:41 PM
Message	"We did a test on my car going from full 3 inch to coning back to a 2.5" catback system and I kept all the early gains of going 3 inch and only lost 13 RWHP after 6000 RPM with coning back down to 2.5"." [ http://www.twinturbo.net/net/viewmsg.aspx?forum=general&msg_id=2033426 ] Since 2007, this has probably changed quite a bit since we now have breather mods. 1993 TT. R.I.P. 09.15.2010
Follow Ups	Specialty Z 3" downpipes and 3" to 2.5" testpipes - Poom (Pittsburgh) 20:47:47 04/16/12 Huge difference. (n/m) - Evan(CA) 21:03:36 04/16/12 Re: Huge difference. - Poom (Pittsburgh) 21:41:01 04/16/12 As Greg said... - PiotrC70 22:46:29 04/16/12 All of the above. - Evan(CA) 23:59:17 04/16/12 I have a similar setup with the JWT 530's. When I went to - bbug 22:31:13 04/16/12 Your car looks great by the way (n/m) - RICH1 13:17:59 04/17/12 Improvement just from larger TB's? - ZXoltan 16:21:50 04/17/12 I didn't isolate the TB's between dynos so unfortunately - bbug 00:13:09 04/18/12 Re: Improvement just from larger TB's? - Poom (Pittsburgh) 07:38:24 04/19/12 yes (n/m) - ztunerz 22:58:44 04/16/12 Big improvements are to be had with those upgrades - Aqualung 14:15:06 04/17/12 I hate to ask... - KeeZ 05:13:54 04/18/12 If Im not mistaken I believe there was a post about that - PandaManZ32 06:06:40 04/18/12 SZ quality definitely better from what others have posted - ZXoltan 06:30:29 04/18/12 There is no comparison in quality. The AlloyToyz/AMS units - BigTDogg (MA) 09:20:16 04/18/12 I do not doubt the difference in the quality of the material - KeeZ 13:20:04 04/18/12 I wouldnt say HUGE, but noticable (n/m) - Rogy 17:13:49 04/18/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.