Subject	Re: Thanks for clarifying
Posted by	Tech@EPR on February 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM
	This message has been viewed 87 times.
In Reply To	Thanks for clarifying (n/m) posted by ZXoltan on February 12, 2012 at 07:20 AM
Message	np Facebook = www.facebook.com/epracing
Follow Ups	Crankshaft transformation - Tech@EPR 22:57:20 02/11/12 Looks great... (n/m) - Zski 23:28:40 02/11/12 b-e-a-utiful!! (n/m) - _frame_ 23:30:32 02/11/12 Re: Crankshaft transformation - Jason300zxTT 23:38:00 02/11/12 Re: Re: Crankshaft transformation - Tech@EPR 14:21:06 02/12/12 it doesn't need to be balanced? - FuerGrissa 23:45:42 02/11/12 It needs to be balanced with the rods and pistons, I would - Red Hawk (CO) 00:25:30 02/12/12 Re: it doesn't need to be balanced? - Tech@EPR 01:55:04 02/12/12 What's the resulting balance factor? Wouldn't 50% - Jim (Selin Design) 13:24:18 02/12/12 Re: What's the resulting balance factor? Wouldn't 50% - Tech@EPR 14:19:50 02/12/12 Ah ok good to know. Looks good. (n/m) - Jim (Selin Design) 14:29:43 02/13/12 Re: Crankshaft transformation - BLACK Z 01:08:08 02/12/12 Re: Re: Crankshaft transformation - Tech@EPR 01:59:43 02/12/12 Welding the center weight? - ZXoltan 02:19:55 02/12/12 looks welded to me. (n/m) - FuerGrissa 02:49:03 02/12/12 Re: Welding the center weight? - Tech@EPR 03:26:02 02/12/12 Thanks for clarifying (n/m) - ZXoltan 07:20:50 02/12/12 Re: Thanks for clarifying - Tech@EPR 14:20:13 02/12/12 Nice. No EP Racing Oil pan?? (n/m) - Boosted1 08:36:33 02/12/12 no crank scraper? (n/m) - aliaZ 09:29:27 02/12/12 Re: no crank scraper? - Tech@EPR 10:56:24 02/12/12 I like it!! (n/m) - 1badz32 (MN) 15:43:04 02/12/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.